Followers

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

India’s water crisis is set to worsen

In Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, a touchstone of dystopian literature, men will visit violence upon each other for the sake of water to drink. The future, unfortunately, is now in Latur in Maharashtra’s Marathwada region where the collector has invoked Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code relating to unlawful assembly. His order prohibits more than five people from gathering near 20 water storage tanks until 31 May in order to prevent possible violence over water scarcity in the drought-hit area. This has been some time coming. Last year, the city’s residents were supplied municipal water once in 15 days; this was later lowered to once a month.
In Punjab, meanwhile, the state Assembly has defied the Supreme Court to resolve that the Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal (SYL) will not be built. With the Punjab Sutlej-Yamuna Link Land (Return of Property Rights) Bill, 2016, it has decided to deny Haryana its allotted share of the waters of the Ravi and Beas rivers, reneging on a 1976 deal. The consequence: half of the state receiving canal water for eight days after every 32 days, with the state’s southern regions particularly hard-hit.
The specifics are different in both cases. But there are two common inefficiencies that reflect upon India’s burgeoning water crisis—political and agricultural, the latter deriving in large part from the former.
Maharashtra’s sugar belt— which includes Marathwada— declared record production of the crop in 2014-15, a year in which it also faced a second drought after 2012-13. The problem: sugarcane is a water-guzzling crop, consuming over 70% of irrigated water, although it occupies just about 4% of farmed land in the state. That discrepancy hasn’t stopped successive state governments from bailing out the sugar industry time and again with subsidies and loan waivers, short-circuiting market dynamics and incentivizing sugarcane production. This must be seen in the context of the sugar lobby’s political influence and the involvement of a number of state politicians in the industry.
The SYL presents a different kind of opportunism. The issue, framed in populist terms, has been used as a political football since the days of the Khalistan movement. That legacy has shaped the terms of the debate, particularly in light of Punjab’s crop patterns; water-intensive rice crops cover over 60% of the state’s area under cultivation. That makes it easy to portray any inclination to honour the SYL agreement as being antifarmer, the kiss of death in Punjab’s politics.
Marathwada and the SYL are a microcosm of the water disputes that speckle the Indian map. And they are going to grow more intractable. Over the past 50 years, per capita availability of fresh water in India has declined from 3,000 cubic metres to a little over a thousand cubic metres; the global average is 6,000 cubic metres. Underlying this, both cause and effect, is escalating groundwater scarcity.
Of the country’s two sources of fresh water—surface water and groundwater—the latter accounts for some 55%. It also accounts for about 60% of irrigation needs, which take up 80% of India’s total water usage. That skewed pattern is in direct and growing conflict with growing urbanization levels, given that urban water demand per capita daily is thrice as high as rural demand. With India’s urban population expected to hit 50% of the total population by 2050, according to UN figures, that is an untenable situation.
As Marathwada and SYL show, the problem ties into a political ecosystem that is entangled in calculations of patronage and electoral viability. Massive agricultural subsidies, a mainstay of every administration, have incentivized indiscriminate water usage and inefficient cultivation patterns—a problem the Economic Survey 2015-16, presented last month, recognized when it said that the system “encourages using more inputs such as fertiliser, water and power, to the detriment of soil quality, health and the environment”. The result, according to the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration: India’s water tables are dropping at the rate of 0.3 metre a year. That sets up a vicious cycle, increasing the importance and political value of surface water, making those disputes more difficult in turn, thus boosting dependence on—and depletion of—groundwater. And unpredictable monsoon adds to the mix; according to the Central Water Commission’s latest numbers, water levels in India’s most important reservoirs now stand at a mere 29% of total capacity.
South Asia is a severely water insecure region. Climate change, according to multiple studies, will hit Asia’s coastal regions among the hardest; large parts of India are already highly stressed. Today happens to be World Water Day. It’s an apt time to consider the policies that are hastening the process.

India’s Agasthyamala among 20 UNESCO world biosphere reserves

India has been campaigning for the inclusion of the reserve in the network for the past few years.

The sustained campaign to include the Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve (ABR) in UNESCO’s World Network of Biosphere Reserves (BR) has eventually paid off.
The Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve was included at the International Coordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere programme of UNESCO that concluded in Peru on March 19.
The ABR covers the Shendurney and Peppara wildlife sanctuaries and parts of the Neyyar sanctuary in Kerala and the Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve of Tamil Nadu.
India has been campaigning for the inclusion of the reserve in the network for the past few years.
10 make it to the list
The Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve was the only site considered from the country by the International Advisory Committee for Biosphere Reserves during the Paris session held last year. That time, the ABR was listed in the category of “nominations recommended for approval, pending the submission of specific information.”
With the addition of the ABR, 10 of the 18 biosphere reserves in the country have made it to the list.
The others are Nilgiri, Gulf of Mannar, Sunderban, Nanda Devi, Nokrek, Pachmarh, Similipal, Achanakmar-Amarkantak and Great Nicobar.
The BRs are designated for inclusion in the network by the International Coordinating Council after evaluating the nominations forwarded by the State through National MAB Committees.
Scientific expertise
The ABR would benefit from the shared scientific expertise of all the other members of the world network. The State is expected to work for the conservation of nature at the reserve while it fosters the sustainable development of its population, said a UNESCO official.
The ABR is situated at the southern-most end of the Western Ghats and spread over Kerala and Tamil Nadu and covers an area of 3,500 sq km at an altitude ranging from 100 metres to 1,868 metres above the Mean Sea Level.
Hotspot
The area falls in the Malabar rainforests and is one of the noted hotspot areas because of its position in the Western Ghats, according to the management plan of the reserve. It is estimated that more than 2,250 species of dicotyledonous plants are in the area and 29 are endemic to the region. Many plants are considered endangered too.
Researchers have noted that about 400 Red Listed Plants have been recorded from ABR. About 125 species of orchids and rare, endemic and threatened plants have been recorded from the reserve.
There are 669 biosphere reserves in as many as 120 countries.
Source: The Hindu, 22-03-2016

Standing up to patent bullying

The Modi government must stop engaging U.S. bureaucrats as patent consultants and instead showcase the Indian patent statute as an exemplar for a balanced regime

Earlier this month, the media reported that India “privately” assured the United States that it will not issue any more compulsory licenses. This report was reminiscent of a theory propounded by psychologist Lenore E. Walker in 1979 on abusive patterns in relationships.
Four stages of abuse
Walker studied abuse in family situations and outlined an important model detailing four stages of abuse. Had the U.S. and India been human beings, this would have been a classic case of household abuse. The first stage documented by Dr. Walker is tension-building where there is strain in the relationship and one partner tries to dominate the situation. Indeed, the U.S. has successfully dominated the discussions simply by citing India every single year, most often unfairly, to take control of the situation. For years, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) has pounded India using the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), an administrative body, as its chosen mechanism to repeatedly criticise India and unfairly escalate issues on a yearly basis. The preaching from the PhRMA filtered through the USTR’s pressure tactic has been in complete disregard of the impact on India’s sovereignty and public health. The issuance of notices by USTR for submissions by industry followed by the dramatisation to convene public hearings expecting sovereign nations to justify their positions to the U.S. administrative body are all acts leading towards escalation of tensions. In fact, the USTR process is a documented attempt to dominate and direct other countries’ trade postures. The process allows the U.S. to unilaterally exert pressure indirectly to amend laws or cease fair implementation of local laws although the U.S. has agreed to multilaterally resolve all disputes. Importantly, the legality of such unilateral Special 301 process of the USTR is, at best, shaky under the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) jurisprudence. Yet, it allows the U.S. to cite the USTR’s Special 301 process to take control of the dialogue — this forms Dr. Walker’s second stage of the abusive cycle (the incident itself).
The announcement from India, though, landed the country into the third stage. Dr. Walker terms this as the honeymoon stage wherein the abused feels confused and may mistakenly feel responsible. India is in classic third stage, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi attempting to pacify President Barack Obama by instituting a committee to create a National Intellectual Property Rights policy long after the statutes were amended to become compliant with the WTO’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Now, the “private” announcement to not implement an important flexibility — compulsory license — established as a safeguard to protect public health firmly posits India into the end of the third stage of abuse. The fourth stage, according to Dr. Walker, is a phase of relative calm and peace, which we hope India will enjoy.
If there is a cautionary note here, it is that reconciliation never ends the cycle of abuse. Assuredly, neither PhRMA nor the USTR will relent or retract from this pattern until India economically harms itself by instituting TRIPS and other measures leaving the Indian generic industry on a suicidal path. After all, abuse is a pattern of control that one party exercises over the other to force actions or inactions that cause some form of harm to the abused.
Compulsory license
Meanwhile, the Modi government needs to appreciate that compulsory license is an important flexibility that countries negotiated as part of their membership with the WTO. India has one of the most sophisticated compulsory licensing provisions which is fully compliant with the TRIPS agreement. Under the Indian law, compulsory licenses can be granted on several grounds including satisfying the reasonable requirements of the public with respect to the patented invention, ensuring availability to the public at reasonable price, meeting the demand for the patented product, and tackling national public health emergencies. The step India took when it compulsorily licensed the Bayer drug, Nexavar, which was originally priced approximately at $4,700 per month and beyond the reach of even the top 20 per cent of Indians, was bold. It showcased India’s confidence that its patent statute has been carefully engineered to accommodate India’s national objectives within the scope of the flexibilities accorded under the TRIPS agreement.
Patenting, a concern in the U.S.
Further, the Modi government will do well to appreciate that even in the U.S., patenting and its effect on unrealistic drug pricing has become a major concern. For example, in 2015, Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden and senior committee member Chuck Grassley sought public comments on the high price of Sovaldi, a Gilead drug, and its impact on the U.S. health care system. In 2016, several Democratic members of the House reportedly urged government agencies to consider diluting or diminishing the exclusive rights of drug companies. Recently, a survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation reported that 77 per cent of the American public picked the increasing prices of drugs for HIV, hepatitis, mental illness and cancer as their foremost health concern. Given such realities, India needs to confidently showcase how it handled Bayer’s unrealistically high pricing of Nexavar using Section 84 of the patent statute (compulsory licenses).
Importantly, compulsory licensing forms a part of a larger package of flexibilities that India negotiated with the support of other G-77 and African countries in the Doha Development Round. These are valuable concessions that India cannot afford to forget or renege from. The burden is on this government to ensure that its work is not seen as resulting in losing the ground that previous governments had gained on the subject. In any event, it is best for the Modi government to stop engaging U.S. bureaucrats as patent consultants and instead showcase the Indian patent statute as an exemplar for a balanced patent regime to the rest of the developing world.
(Srividhya Ragavan is Professor of Law, Texas A&M University School of Law.)
Source: The Hindu, 22-03-2016
International Water Day Imperatives


The escalation of the conflict between Punjab and Haryana over the Sutlej-Yamuna Link is pointer to rising water scarci ty in the country. Of the 20 major river systems, 14 are already water-stressed; 75% of the population live in water-stressed regions, a third of whom live in water-scarce areas. Climate change, the demands of a rising population and the need for agriculture to keep pace, increased rate of urbanisation and industrialisation will exacerbate water stress.The Constitution has water as a state subject, except for reg ulation of inter-state rivers. The Centre, at best, plays referee Rising water-stress makes imperative a national legal and po licy framework for water to ensure fair and equitable alloca tion amongst different regions and with in regions among user groups, environ ment protection, development priorities efficient water use, demand and supply Key to ensuring balance between compet ing demands is a basin-based approach to allocate water amongst constituent regi ons and states. This will require setting up river basin-based authorities that must both be represen tative of all constituents and staffed by experts. Allocating fair share of water for every state requires assessments based on objective criteria such as specificities of the river basin size of dependent population, existing water use and demand efficiency of use, and projected future use, and alignment of development priorities, while ensuring the environmental needs of the river and aquifer. The basin authorities must cre ate a hierarchy of uses.
An equitable, efficient and scientific allocation that reconci les competing demands and is legally enforceable will stand India in good stead in negotiating water treaties with its nei ghbours, especially China.
Source: Economic Times, 22-03-2016
Best Deal in Life


If you really want the best deal in life, stop making deals. The deal will happen if it's necessary; it won't happen if it's not.Once we're in this world, there are transactions, personal or otherwise. To get mileage out of a deal, you have to first assess the level of intelligence of the other party . If you just give of yourself and see how both of you can benefit from the deal, then whenever possible, it will happen.Yes, deals are subject to many other conditions, such as market situations, economic conditions or the world situation, but if you establish your inner way of being and are doing the best you can do, then what has to happen, according to your capability , will happen.
What you can't do won't happen anyway . However, if your whole life is about making deals, you'll be miserable. God never made a deal with anybody .In a way , everybody is a businessman. Everybody is trying to pull off some deal: some in the marketplace, another maybe at home, in the temple, and others even with their spiritual process, but everybody is trying to pull off a deal.
When you get a good deal, you are civilised and nice, but if a deal goes bad, you yell and scream. Don't worry about always pulling off deals, deals and more deals. Just learn to offer yourself, which is the best possible thing that you can offer.Then, naturally , people will take it if it's what they need.Why don't you just fall in love with the whole situation?
Then, work becomes effortless.

Monday, March 21, 2016

Economic and Political Weekly: Table of Contents

Vol. 51, Issue No. 12, 19 Mar, 2016

Editorials

50 Years of EPW

Law and Society

Commentary

Book Reviews

Perspectives

Money, Banking and Finance 2016

Current Statistics

Appointments/programmes/announcements 

Letters

SBI launches Collateral Free Education Loan to Study Abroad 

State Bank of India (SBI) has launched an overseas education loan ‘SBI Global Ed-Vantage’, for students who want to pursue higher education abroad.
SBI Scholar Loan scheme has been specifically designed for those students who get admission to a specific list of 100+ top institutions in India, covering engineering, management, medicine, law etc.
The loan is collateral free and is available at low interest rates. In recent years, there have been a steady increase in enquiries for educational finance for foreign Universities. But due to high cost of education, the students often find it difficult to pursue their studies for want of adequate finance.
The SBI Global Ed-Vantage aims to support those students who are pursuing full-time regular courses in foreign colleges and universities. This will cover courses from regular full-time graduate, postgraduate and doctorate courses in engineering, technology, science, medicine, mathematics and management in institutions of countries including the USA, the UK, Canada, Australia, Singapore, Japan, Hong Kong and Europe. The amount of the loan is from Rs 20 lakh to Rs 1.5 crore and up to 80 per cent of cost of course is eligible for financing. There is a special concession of 0.5 per cent for girl students.

Source: Posted by Elets News Network (ENN) Posted on March 18, 2016