Followers

Friday, April 24, 2015


Union Cabinet approves lowering of age of Juveniles from 18 to 16 years for heinous crimes


Union Cabinet has approved lowering of age of juveniles from eighteen to sixteen years for heinous crimes. Decision in this regard was taken by Union Cabinet meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The cabinet also approved to introduce Amendment to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Bill, 2014. This amendment will propose and add special provisions to tackle heinous offences like murder and rape committed by juveniles in the age group of 16-18 years. The proposed bill will amend the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. The parent Act clearly defines and classifies offences as serious, petty and heinous and defines differentiated processes for each classified category. While the amendments in the bill adds provisions that in case a heinous crime committed by a person between 16 and 18 years, will be examined by the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) to assess if the crime was committed as a child or as an adult. Then the trial of the case will take place as a juvenile or as an adult on basis of JJBs assessment and decide whether the culprit should be sent to observation home or tried in a regular court. Background The changes in the Parent Act come against the backdrop of outrage over the conviction of a minor in the Delhi gang-rape case of December 2012. The minor in this case was tried in a juvenile court and was sentenced to three years in a reform home. However, the lighter punishment to this minor had triggered a debate on punishment for juveniles convicted of heinous crimes.


Margin:The Journal of Applied Economic Research

Table of Contents

May 2015; 9 (2)

Articles

Tamil Nadu has max autonomous educational institutes in country 


Tamil Nadu has close to one-third of all the autonomous educational institutions in the country and the numbers are escalating. Of the 155 colleges with autonomy in the state, only 27 are engineering or architecture institutions, with most offering courses in arts, pure sciences, humanities and management.
Experts say that there are around 80 autonomous arts and science colleges in the state, with the most independent institutions in the Coimbatore region.
“When Anna University, Coimbatore, was given jurisdiction over engineering colleges in the region in 2009, many colleges were awarded the status of autonomous institutions,” education consultant J P Gandhi said.”There was hesitation initially from universities to award autonomous status to colleges affiliated to them but that gradually changed.”
“Autonomy gives colleges the freedom to frame their own syllabus based on market needs,” Sri Krishna Institutions chief executive officer K Sundararaman said. “It also allows them to opt for innovative courses that may be added to the curriculum with approval from the university to which they are affiliated.”

Researching Reality Internship 2015, 5JUN-17JUL, CCS, New Delhi.

5 June - 17 July 2015.
About the Internship: Researching Reality Internship is for college students and researchers who wish to apply social and economic principles to real-life problems through in-depth research projects. It provides interns with valuable training in areas of research, analysis, writing, and above all critical thinking. Interns study various agencies, boards, corporations, departments, schemes and programs of the state governments and Municipal Corporations; evaluating existing systems to recommend sustainable and long-term policy improvements in the functioning of government structures. The objective of the internship is to further citizens’ understanding of the workings of the government and encourage greater independent fact-based qualitative and quantitative research so that the next time citizens demand better governance, they can back their claims.
The internship is open during a summer and also a non-summer period.

Application Process: Eligibility: Application is open for all researchers, college going students, graduate and post graduate, recent graduates, and IB students in 11th and 12th standard. International as well as domestic applications are welcome. 

Registration Fee: There is no fee for participating in the Researching Reality Internship, however, interns must make their own living arrangements and must cover their own travel and living expenses.

Application Form: Click here to apply.


Important Dates:es to watch:

  • Application Deadline: Thursday, 30 April 2015
  • First list announcement: Monday, 04 May 2015
  • Interviews: Saturday-Sunday, 9-10 May 2015
  • Final list announcement: Monday, 11 May 2015
  • Internship dates: 5 June - 17 July 2015
For more info contact: Sadaf Hussain | internship@ccs.in | +91-9953133868.
NICE PhD, THINK IT WAS WORTH IT?
Bloomberg


Yes, there are modest financial rewards. But unless you're one of those people who absolutely loves being a scholar, you're probably going to pay heavy costs in terms of your lifestyle and mental state
As you may have heard, the job market has been tough for the last decade-and-a-half.Median wages have flatlined.One way to shelter from the economic storm --at least, for those with the talent-has been to get an advanced degree. Now, you could get a medical or a law degree, but those cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Why not get paid to go to school?
Why not get a doctoral degree?
An increasing number of people have been taking that option. The number of doctorates rose steadily throughout the 2000s (see chart).
Most of those PhDs were in science, engineering and the social sciences. I was among those in the latter category .
So the question is: Should you go the PhD route? Thinking about the costs and benefits of a decision like this isn't easy-many of the costs are hidden, and not monetary in nature.
First, let's look at the economics. The wage premium for PhDs is pretty substantial. The median PhD earned at least $20,000 more than the median worker with only an undergraduate degree. Since graduate school usually gives you free tuition plus a stipend after the first year, the vast majority of the financial cost is opportunity cost. You will be giving up five to seven years of earnings. If you would have earned $80,000 a year in the working world, then the PhD will cost you anywhere from $400,000 to $560,000 in forgone earnings. With those numbers, the cost and benefit just about balance out.
Now, not all PhDs are equal. Those with doctorates in science and engineering make a much higher wage premium than humanities PhD.s--almost $40,000 a year. Financially speaking, that looks like a good deal. So from a financial standpoint, the PhD doesn't look so bad.But what about those non-financial costs and benefits?
The main benefit of a PhD is the lifestyle. A lot of your time in a doctoral programme will be spent learning and thinking about the deepest, most complicated, advanced ideas in the world. You basically get to be a low-paid professor for a few years. If you're the type of person who loves using your brain, a doctorate will give you a more pleasing mental workout than most jobs. But the other aspects of graduate school life are not so enticing. Here I speak from personal experience and from the experience of many friends. Many people think a PhD programme will be like five more years of college. Well, if you think that, you're headed for disappointment.
First, college students are often subsidised by their parents, or by the jet fuel of student loans. In graduate school, though, you're on your own, receiving your $15,000 to $20,000 annual stipend.When you're 19, sleeping on dirty couches and wearing the same shirt five days in a row is romantic and bohemian; when you're 29, it just makes you feel like a poor person. Your friends with jobs will be buying houses and cars; you will be living with roommates. The grad student is the modern equivalent of the impoverished scholar of times past; even back in the 1500s, Cervantes had Don Quixote give a speech comparing grad school to being in the army .
Nor is grad school the same kind of social environment as college. In college you meet people from all walks of life; in a PhD programme, much of your social scene consists of a small, insular group of highly-competitive people who all do the same thing that you do. In a way , graduate school is more like high school than college.
Then there's the work. After the first two years of classes and tests, you're on your own. Your one job is to do some good research. Lots of people flounder here.After their course work ends, many students find themselves at a loss. They have done a lot of learning and not much creating or discovering--skills that not only are different than learning but that may even be at cross purposes...[A] dissertation writer without enough scepticism will never advance beyond previous knowledge and never discover that something previously learned was false.
It's crucially important to get a good adviser in graduate school, but in many fields--such as economics--that alone won't do the job for you. You have to make up research projects on your own. Every day , you will be working on those projects, not really knowing whether you're making great progress or spinning your wheels. It's a little like being an entrepreneur, but without the camaraderie of the team. No wonder about 60% of grad students say they feel “overwhelmed, exhausted, hopeless, sad, or depressed nearly all the time.“
Then there's the job market. Although PhDs can, and sometimes do, go into all kinds of jobs, they are systematically steered toward academic work. After all, as a graduate student, your main adviser is someone who chose an academic career--naturally , they're going to steer you in the same direction. Dan Drezner of the Washington Post warns of the subtle danger that this attitude produces.The academic job market has little growth, is highly competitive and doesn't pay very well. Getting a PhD means putting yourself in an environment where many people think that if you don't throw yourself into that barren market, you're a failure. That kind of social pressure can be hard to take.
So make no mistake: graduate school is no picnic. Yes, there are modest financial rewards. But unless you're one of those people who absolutely loves being a scholar, you're probably going to pay heavy costs in terms of your lifestyle and mental state. These are things I wish I had known about before I did my own PhD. Think twice before jumping on the grad school train.
Vedanta - Faith Goes with Reason


A little girl was to undergo an operation. The surgeon told her, “Before we can make you well, we must put you to sleep for a little while.“ She looked up and smiled, “Oh, if you are going to put me to sleep, I must say my prayers first.“ She knelt down beside the table and prayed. Later, the surgeon said that he prayed that night for the first time in 30 years.Prayer doesn't change things. It changes people, and people change things. So, don't pray for lighter burdens.Pray for stronger backs.
Faith, as embodied in religion, and reason as embodied in science, are often erroneously thought of as being in opposition to each other. But science is not an enemy of religion, only of superstition.
Both science and religion are engaged in the search for truth, the main difference lies in their methodologies.
Science is an investigation of truth in the finite nature outside, the object. Religion is an investigation into the nature of the infinite, the subject. Science aims for universally verifiable knowledge. Religion aims for individual realisation. Universal laws operate regardless of one's beliefs and faith. We are closer to the physical world than to the metaphysical. We respect science, because it is premised on reason.
Swami Sivananda holds that science knows little about the origin of life, the origin of thought, and the origin and destiny of human nature and the universe. Even scientists are quite conscious of these limitations of science and scientific method. Faith is not predicated upon reason. It is beyond reason.
Govt puts major NGO funder Ford Foundation under watch
New Delhi:


The Centre on Thursday placed US-based Ford Foundation on its watch list for allegedly funding organizations not registered under the Foreign Contributions Registration Act 2010 and for other activities flagged by central intelligence agencies.This means that Ford Foundation, an old and generous contributor, cannot extend financial assistance to any organization or individual without clearance from the Union home ministry .
The action comes weeks af ter the Gujarat government sought action against the agency for “direct interference...in internal affairs of the country and of abetting communal disharmony“. The state government alleged two of the beneficiaries, Sabrang Trust and Citizens for Justice & Peace associated with activist Teesta Setalvad, were “proxy offices of Ford Foundation for a long-term plan“.
Official sources referred to alleged FCRA violations and denied that the action was part of efforts to squeeze the space for NGOs, many of them critical of the Centre on issues like environment, human rights and use of nuclear energy. The action against Ford Foundation follows tough approach towards other foreign-funded NGOs like Greenpeace.
“In exercise of powers conferred under Section 46 of FCRA, 2010, Reserve Bank of India is requested to instruct all banks...to ensure that any fund flow from the above mentioned agency to any person, NGO, organization in India may be brought to the notice of this ministry ,“ the home ministry directed in a letter to the RBI.
Responding to an email from TOI, Ford Foundation said it was unaware of the government's action but would “respond fully to offi cial queries directed to us“.Maintaining that the founda tion's activities were transparent and in the public domain, it said, “We have been and continue to be deeply respectful of the laws of the and and, therefore, of the process now underway . We are confident in our work and compliance with the law and ook forward to the outcome of this inquiry.“
Top home ministry officials, however, justified the action against Ford Founda tion, which through its Delhi office has so far made grants worth over $508 million to nearly 1,250 institutions in India-Nepal-Sri Lanka region. “Intelligence reports said the donor was funding non-FCRA registered organi zations. There were other allegations too. “Given that Ford Foundation was not doing due diligence while making donations...we invoked our powers under FCRA and followed due legal procedure to put it on the watchlist,“ the official told TOI.
“Government organizations can avail of foreign funding only with clearance of the department of economic affairs...Any instance of government organization receiving funds directly from this agency may be withheld and brought to the notice of this ministry ,“ said the letter.
Earlier this month, the government suspended the FCRA registration of Greenpeace India citing several irregularities. The move was slammed by Greenpeace and NGO activists alike.
“In any case, we are not blocking its funds but only subjecting them to scrutiny ...this will not affect bona fide activities of Ford Foundation in India as MHA processes for prior clearance do not take much time,“ said the official.
Ford Foundation is the 16th international donor to be put under watch by the government. Others include Greenpeace International, Climate Work Foundation and CORDAID.
Ford Foundation was on the radar of intelligence agencies for long, with alleged grants to India Against Corruption associated with the Anna Hazare movement being subjected to scrutiny .

Thursday, April 23, 2015

International Conference on Applied research in Business, Management, Economics and Finance (ARC-2015), Colombo, 14-15 AUG,2015

ARC 2015- III INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED RESEARCH IN BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE

Colombo, Sri Lanka
August 14-15, 2015

Call for Abstract / Full papers: Academic Research Conference is the premier forum for the presentation of new advances and research results in the fields of theoretical, applied Research on Business & Management, Economics and Finance and applied Management Technology and Science. The conference will bring together leading researchers, academicians, and scholars in the domain of interest from around the world. This conference is Co-Sponsored by University of Keleniya, Keleniya, Sri Lanka.


Important Dates

Last Date for Abstract submission           June 15, 2015
Last Date for Full Paper Submission        July 1, 2015
Early Bird Registration before            June 1, 2015
Conference Schedule Release                  July 15, 2015
Conference Dates                                   August 14-15, 2015
                                                                                                               
Publication Opportunities: All Abstracts of registered participants will be published in conference compendium (ISBN Publication). All papers will undergo peer review and after acceptance will be published in IARJBM or IARJEF, if desired by the contributors. Submitted papers must not be under consideration by any other journal or publication.

International Academic Research Journal of Business and Management
ISSN: 2227-1287(Print),Impact Factor-5.60 (Index Copernicus)
International Academic Research Journal of Economics and Management
ISSN: 2227-6254(Print),Impact Factor-6.11 (Index Copernicus)

For further details, please visit conferences webpage: www.arcconferences.com

Contact: Jey Yoganand / Kevin Smith, Conference Coordinators,
Academic Research Conferences,

 

100% placement at IIM-Trichy, average salary escalates

In the present scenario, not just the major IIM’s, but also the newer ones, are setting excellent placement records. IIM’s have always set benchmarks for academic excellence and this year, IIM-Tiruchirappalli (IIM-T) has recorded 100 per cent placement, with marginally higher average salaries than last year.
It may be mentioned here that sometime back, Prof Saral Mukherjee, who served as Chairperson of the Placement Committee at IIM Ahmedabad during 2008-12 and as Member of the Placement Committee (2012-13) had said that placements at IIMs are not an entitlement, determined by mood in corporate India.
IIM-T has informed that out of the total 106 students belonging to the batch of 2013-15, 103 registered for placements and all were placed. In all, 103 recruiters visited the campus as against 76 companies last year. 106 offers were made, with students getting multiple offers, compared to 86 offers last year.
The highest salary offer this year was Rs 19.50 lakhs, marginally higher from Rs 19.25 lakh offered last year. The institute said that the number of offers at the higher band exceeded last year’s numbers. At the lower end, the minimum salary package witnessed a 20% increase from last year and ended at Rs 7.5 lakh. The median annual compensation levels continued to be around Rs 11 lakh.
Abhishek Totawar, chairperson, placement & external relations at IIM-T said, “Our biggest efforts this time was to match students’ interests with the recruiters and job profiles and we have been able to satisfy majority of our students”.

June 21: Universities to observe International Yoga Day

The University Grants Commission (UGC) has asked all universities to observe June 21 as International Yoga Day, an official statement said has said. Secretary Jaspal S. Sandhu, in a letter dated April 17, said the idea of declaring an International Yoga Day was formally proposed by the prime minister in his maiden address to the 69th UN General Assembly on September 27. In a letter was shared on the UGC website.
The secretary added that the government has decided to give ‘practical effect’ to the resolution by ensuring that the first International Yoga Day is “commemorated in a befitting manner”.
“You are, therefore, requested to kindly observe International Day of Yoga on 21st June, 2015 in your esteemed university and colleges affiliated to your university,” the letter said. “You may also ensure that the promotional films and other Information, Education and Communication (IEC) material on yoga should be distributed,” it added.
The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution last year to observe International Yoga Day on June 21 every year.

Vedanta - Sankara's Path of Self-inquiry


Adi Sankaracharya's life was dedicated to a quest for Truth.He said, `Brahmn (Consciousness) alone is real, the world is illusory . The individual and Universal Soul are one'. Sankara's advaita is in contrast to other thought-systems of the time, like Ramanujacharya's visishtadvaita which treads middle ground by focusing on the relation between world and God; and Madhava's dvaita or dualistic world-view.Sankara's is a call to free inquiry , which sets the tone of all speculation.His two-level theory of the Brahmn is at once abstruse and simple, as detailed in his magnum opus Brahma-sutra Bhashya, and also in smaller masterpieces like AtmaBodha and Vivekachudamani. He perceives Consciousness as being essentially featureless, but manifesting itself with illusory attributes.
Sankara uses everyday metaphors and similes to illustrate advaitic concepts, comparing at one point the practice of knowledge which purifies by removing ignorance with the method of purifying muddy water with kataka-nut powder. Just as powder sprinkled on the surface of water forms a film and drags all impurities to the bottom leaving pure water on the surface, constant practice and use of knowledge removes the dirt of ignorance.Also, like the kataka-nut powder, which merges into the water after doing its work, knowledge too disappears after the Self emerges.
Sankara also used the metaphor of oyster shells scattered along a beach, which on a moonlit night, are mistaken for silver. Just as the illusion of silver lasts in the perceiver's mind only till he recognises the reality of oyster shells, so too does the world of names and forms exist till Self-knowledge dawns.
Juvenile boards will take final call


The Juvenile Justice Act will be changed to allow for trial of juveniles aged 16-18, accused of heinous crimes, as adults under the Indian Penal Code, with the Modi government bowing to the clamour for a tough deterrent against young criminals who go unpunished because of the lenient provisions under the law.As per the changes cleared by the Union Cabinet on Wednesday , Juvenile Justice Boards will decide whether a juvenile accused of a heinous crime ought to be treated as a child or an adult. The proposed Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Bill also provides for classification of crimes as “petty“, “serious“ and “heinous“, and differentiated processes for each category . Under existing law, only those aged 18 and above are tried under IPC.
The decision heeds the demand for tougher punishment to hardened “juvenile criminals“, which spiked after the Nirbhaya gang rape in December 2012. One of the accused in the crime which shook the nation is a juvenile who was said to be the most brutal of the gang.
The proposed changes come in the teeth of opposition from child rights activists and members of the parliamentary standing committee who argued that even horrific crimes don't subvert the reason for laying down a milder legal regime for minors. The Juvenile Justice Act provides for leniency for juvenile criminals on the ground that they are of impressionable mind and, hence, incapable of either thinking through their actions or fully recognizing the consequences of their alleged crimes.
While the opponents have been overruled, their concern has been factored in by providing for a two-stage process to determine whether a juvenile accused of a crime classified as “heinous“ deserved to be treated as an “adult“ and, therefore, was unworthy of protection provided for under the Juvenile Justice Act.
Under the proposed law, Juvenile Justice Boards will take the final call on the sensitive matter. An official press release emphasized, “Since this assessment will take place by the JJB, which will have psychologists and social experts, it will ensure that the rights of the juvenile are duly protected. The trial will take place as a juvenile or as an adult on the basis of this assessment.“
It further said, “This brings about a balance that is sensitive to the rights of the child, protective of his legitimate interests and yet conscious of the need to deter crimes, especially brutal crimes against women.“
Although the decision is expected to go down well with people outraged by the growing involvement of “juveniles“ in serious crimes as well as that they could get away lightly , it was not an easy one to take in view of the passionate advocacy of child rights activists and UN laws which put the young on a different footing in matters of crime and punishment.
Earlier this month, PM Narendra Modi referred the issue to a group of ministers for a final round of deliberations in the light of warnings that changes in the JJ Act would mean a raw deal for juveniles who are not mature enough to comprehend the results of their alleged crimes.
“The Cabinet has approved amendments to the Juvenile Justice Act so that those in 1618 age bracket can be tried under IPC if they are accused of heinous crimes,“ telecom minister Ravishankar Prasad told reporters after a meeting of the Union Cabinet.
The bill was introduced in the monsoon session last year and was referred to the standing committee.
The parliamentary panel, in its report in February , rejected the government's proposals to try juveniles between 16-18 years of age as adults on grounds that it is discriminatory , in contravention of the UN Rights of Child and in violation of Article 14 that ensures all are equal in the eyes of law.
For the full report, log on to http:www.timesofindia.com

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Darwin not the first to moot `natural selection'?
London
PTI


A Scottish horticulturist proposed the idea of `evolution by natural selection' 27 years before Charles Darwin, according to a UK scientist who suggests the man should be more widely acknowledged for his contribution.A new paper by King's College London geneticist Dr Michael Weale argues that Patrick Matthew deserves to be considered alongside Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace as one of the three originators of the idea of large-scale evolution by natural selection.
Matthew's version of evolution by natural selection captures a valuable aspect of the theory that isn't so clear in Darwin's version --namely, that natural selection is a deductive certainly more akin to a `law' than a hypothesis or theory to be tested, researchers said.
Matthew (1790-1874) was a Scottish landowner with an interest in politics and agronomy .
He established extensive orchards of apples and pears on his estate at Gourdie Hill, Perthshire, and became adept in horticulture, silviculture and agriculture.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

A software to track cancer treatment

It can help develop Indian standard of drug regimen: Ramesh Nimmagadda

A lot is known about cancer in India — it is one of the leading causes of death, and nearly 0.8 million new cases occur every year. But how much is known about the outcomes of the treatment of cancer? About how patients react to drugs and how they fare long term?
To gather and analyse this data, Ramesh Nimmagadda, director of medical oncology at Apollo Hospitals, has come up with a software programme called ‘OncoCollect.’
“In India, we still use protocols and guidelines of treatment from the West. But as several Indian studies have shown, Indian patients react differently to drug regimens — for instance, they tend to get more side effects and their tolerance for toxicity is lower. That is why collecting and analysing data on cancer treatments and outcomes is crucial, it can help us develop an Indian standard of treatment,” said Dr. Nimmagadda.
Dr. Nimmagadda said the software could be installed on a desktop or to a hospital’s LAN, enabling doctors to key in details of patients. Drugs used in cancer treatment are part of the software, and doctors can choose the regimen they are using. All other forms of cancer treatment are also covered in the software including surgery and radiotherapy.
They could then record responses seen, toxicity/side effects, survival periods and relapses.
Each doctor could analyse his own data for patterns and could also contribute to a pool of data generated, both within a hospital and across the country. The pool could then be studied by data analysers for larger trends. Both the patients’ and the doctors’ identities become anonymous when the data is pooled.
The software is equipped for all cancers and lymphomas except blood cancers.
“For effective use of the software, we have set up the Ramesh Nimmagadda Cancer Foundation. The software will be given free of cost and we will also provide assistance in using it,” said Dr. Nimmagadda.
The idea, said Dr. Nimmagadda, was to gather as much data on as many cancers from as many patients as possible. “Apart from showing us treatment outcomes, it will also show us economic costs — both costs borne by the patient, as well as costs and efficacies of certain drugs used. Some studies have already found that lower dosages work as well as higher dosages — this cost effectiveness too, can be studied,” he said.