Followers

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Eligibility test not needed for those who registered for PhD before 2009

Scholars who completed a PhD or registered for one before 2009 would be eligible for lectureship without clearing the national eligibility test (NET), HRD minister Smriti Irani announced on Tuesday.
The move will help create a larger talent pool for teaching jobs. Women researchers will get more time to complete their research — an additional year for MPhil and two more for PhD — along with maternity leave benefits, Irani said.
At present, a student who has a postgraduate degree or an MPhil and has cleared the NET/SET (state-level eligibility test) is eligible for lectureship in a college or university. If the student fails to clear the eligibility test but has an MPhil degree, he or she can teach in a college, but not a university.
If a student does a PhD in accordance with UGC (University Grants Commission) regulations, such as publication of research papers and presentations in seminars/conferences, he or she is eligible for the post of assistant professor in any college or university.
In 2009, the UGC made NET and a PhD the minimum eligibility criteria for the post of assistant professor in colleges and universities.
On Tuesday, the ministry gave the go-ahead to the commission to exempt such students from NET/SET for teaching jobs in universities and other educational institutions.
However, students will have to fulfil a number of conditions, including that the PhD is offered in regular mode and researchers have published papers as part of their work.
The ministry and the UGC did not have a specific figure on the number of beneficiaries but officials said the decision would benefit hundreds of thousands of aspiring teachers who were so far ineligible as they could not clear the NET or SET.
“There has been a long-standing challenge faced by researchers/aspiring teachers. The UGC today in conjunction with the government has taken this decision,” Irani said.
UGC chairman Ved Prakash said the move would create a greater pool of eligible candidates for recruitment as assistant professors. It would also address the shortage of faculty in educational institutions, he said.
Irani said female students would be given maternity leave of 240 days that would be excluded from the duration of their research. They would also be given eight years compared to the existing six for completing their PhD and three years to complete their MPhil instead of two. The same benefits will be provided to people with disability.
Also, in case of relocation of a female MPhil/PhD scholar due to marriage or other reasons, research data will be allowed to be transferred to the university to which the scholar intends to relocate provided other conditions are met.
Granting more freedom to autonomous institutions and to incentivise quality education, the UGC and the ministry have done away with mandatory inspection of such institutes, nor will they require a no-objection certificate from the state. An autonomous college has academic autonomy to design its curriculum, prescribe syllabi and evolve its own pedagogy.
“They will only have to provide an NOC from the affiliated university and if they are accredited with the highest grade for two consecutive cycles, they would be granted autonomous status,” Irani said.
Source: Hindustan Times, 13-04-2016
Realising the Truth


The process of Self-realisation is not linear. It is not even a process. We don't become anything. We simply realise that which has always been true.Let's say you are walking on a jungle trail and a branch falls across the path. Because of the shape and the way it fell, you think it is a poisonous snake. You draw your weapon, and warn others to stay away .There is nothing to pretend about it. You sincerely believe that your life and the lives of others are at risk. But you are wrong. No matter how committed you are to the delusion, nor how much action, emotion and self-definition you layer on top, the premise is still false. It never was a snake. It was always a piece of wood.
So, it is with the ego. It appears to have a separate reality , which we think we have to protect. But no matter how convincing the illusion, the truth is: we are not separate. The only reality is God.
From the ego's perspective, Self-realisation takes a long time. Once it comes, however, we see that time itself was part of the illusion. Always, it is the Eternal Now. Such thoughts cannot be understood from the level of consciousness asking the question.
Nor, for that matter, by the one writing the answer. As to when soul evolution begins, from the moment a spring emerges from the earth, each drop of water flows toward the sea. So it is with the soul. All beings seek union with God.
To Achieve Peace, First Destroy The Image


For those who are living far away from the frontier, war has little meaning. But to everyone, as a human being, war is a problem, whether it is fought in Pakistan or in India. It is a problem of relationship. This country which has talked about non-violence, which has preached `ahimsa', `don't kill', for millennia, forgets it overnight and is willing to kill because it has an image about the other, and the other has an image about this country .Unless there is a radical revolution in our relationship, we will not have peace. And peace is absolutely necessary ­ not the peace of the politician, not the peace between two wars, between two quarrels, somewhere in faraway heaven, but peace here on earth between you and me. Because, unless you have peace, unless there is this extraordinary thing in your heart and in your mind, you cannot possibly blossom in goodness, you cannot flower in beauty, you cannot see the sky, you cannot see the beauty of the earth. If there is conflict in you, you cannot see anything. So peace is peace in relationship, so that two human beings can work together, think together, solve problems together. problems together.
This peace can only come about when there is in each one of us the understanding of relationship and the complete transformation in that relationship. It is the relationship of two images, and nothing else; and therefore there is no love between two images. How can i love you and you love me if you have an image about me, if you have ideas about me?
If i have hurt you, pushed you, been ambitious, clever and gone ahead of you, how can you love me? How can i love you if you threaten my position, my job, if you run away with my wife? If you belong to one country and i to another, if you belong to one sect ­ Hinduism, Buddhism or Catholicism and the rest of it ­ and i am a Muslim, how can we love each other? You cannot run away from this ­ wherever you live, whether in a monastery , cave or mountain, you are related. You cannot possibly isolate yourself either from your own image which you have created about God, about truth, or from your own image about your own self and all the rest of it.
So to establish right relationship is to destroy the image ­ that you are a Hindu, that i am a Pakistani, Muslim, Catholic, Jew, or communist. You have to destroy the machinery that e image ­ the machinery that creates the image ­ the machinery that is in you and the machinery that is in the other. Otherwise you may destroy one image, and the machinery will create another image. So one has not only to find out the existence of the image ­ that is, to be aware of your particular image ­ but also to be aware of what the machinery is that creates the image.
You cannot just say , `I will destroy the image', and meditate about it, or do some kind of trick, or hypnotise yourself so that you can destroy the image ­ it is not possible. It requires tremendous understanding. It requires great attention and exploration, not a conclusion at any time. And life is an immense river that is flowing, moving incessantly . Unless you follow it freely , with delight, with sensitivity , with great joy , you cannot see the full beauty , the volume, the quality of that river. So we must understand this problem.
Under-20 abortions reveal urban India's liberal attitudes
New Delhi:


Cities Have 21% Pregnancy Wastage Against Rural India's 4.4%
Most abortions reported in urban areas are below the age group of 20, pointing to a more liberal attitude towards sex and earlier engagement in sexual activity, reveals a government health survey .The NSSO survey found that among all pregnancies reported, 77% in rural and 74% in urban areas ended with a live birth while abortion was only 2% in rural and 3% in urban India.
But the highest 14% abortions were seen in the youngest age-group of those below the age of 20 in urban areas.
The survey also found that pregnancy wastage was highest at 21% also in the youngest age group of less than 20 years. `Wastage of pregnancy' is defined as the `total number of pregnancies which did not result into livebirth during the reference period' per 1000 number of completed pregnancies during the same period.' Interesting ly, about 4.4% of the pregnancies were wasted in the rural areas, and it was little higher in urban areas (5.9%) despiteaccessibility of heath care services in cities.
A number of factors a greater readiness to report, a greater incidence, a better access to abortion services could all account for it, but further studies would be required to comment, the survey noted.
It was found that among women in the age group of 15­49 years, about 9.6% in the rural areas and 6.8% in the urban areas were pregnant during the 365 days preceding the date of survey .
The survey also found that in rural India, 56% childbirths took place in public hospitals and 24% in private hospitals. In cities, around 42% children were born in public hospital and 48% in private hospitals. Reflecting lack of health care facilities in rural areas, the survey highlighted that about 20% non-institutional childbirths were reported in villages while it was at 11% in urban areas.

Source: Times of India, 13-04-2016
SC: Why not treat drought as disaster?
With around 10 states reeling under drought, the Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre why the natural calamity could not be brought under the Disaster Management Act to release funds for the welfare of affected families.
A bench of justices Madan B Lokur and N V Ramana mooted the idea after noting that many states had not declared drought. The Centre informed the court that its hands were tied and it could not force states to declare a drought as the matter came within their domain. “Assuming that there is a gross problem in states and people are suffering due to drought, then can the Centre say it cannot intervene and do anything?“ the bench asked.
Additional solicitor general P S Narsimha said there was no statute to regulate declaration of drought.The bench pointed out that drought could be covered under the Disaster Management Act. Narasimha replied that drought was not expressly mentioned in the Disaster Management Act, but it could be covered under loss of crops. The court sought information on the number of people and districts affected by drought, as well as the budgetary allocation for and expenditure of national and state disaster relief funds. The Centre assured the bench that it would place the information before the court on April 19, when the case will be taken up for hearing.

Source: Times of India, 13-04-2016

Saturday, April 09, 2016

Economic and political Weekly: Table of Contents

Vol. 51, Issue No. 14, 02 Apr, 2016

Letter From the Editor

Editorials

Comment

50 Years of EPW

Document

Margin Speak

Commentary

Book Reviews

Perspectives

Special Articles

Notes

Discussion

Current Statistics

Postscript

Appointments/Programmes/Announcements

Letters

Web Exclusives

Sharp increase in number of diabetics, underweight in India, says report

If the number of obese men and women is increasing in India, it ranks number one in the case of underweight adults.

Between 1980 and 2014 the number of adults with diabetes in the world increased four-fold from 108 million to 422 million. The increase has particularly been sharp in low and middle-income countries. In 2014, 50 per cent of adults with diabetes lived in five countries — China, India, the U.S. Brazil and Indonesia, notes a paper published today (April 6) in The Lancet. The paper is based on data from 751 studies totalling 4.4 million adults from 200 countries.
The prevalence of diabetes in adults (after adjusting for age) more than doubled for men in India and China (3.7 to 9.1 per cent in India; 3.5 to 9.9 per cent in China) but increased by 80 per cent among women in India (4.6 to 8.3 per cent) but only 50 per cent in women in China (5 to 7.6 per cent).
The absolute number of adults with diabetes in India increased from 11.9 million in 1980 to 64.5 million in 2014. In the case of China, the increase was from 20.4 million in 1980 to 102.9 million in 2014. While India contributed 15.3 per cent of global share of adults with diabetes in 2014, it was 24.4 per cent in the case of China.
In the case of the U.S., the absolute increase in the number of diabetics was from 8.1 million in 1980 to 22.4 million in 2014. However, global share of adults with diabetes in the case of the U.S. reduced from 7.5 per cent in 1980 to 5.3 per cent in 2014. China, India and the U.S. have maintained their number one, two and three positions in 1980 and 2014.
Indonesia and Pakistan moved up in the world ranking from 12th and 13th position in 1980 (with 2.1 million and 1.7 million diabetics respectively) to fifth and sixth position in 2014 (with 11.7 and 11 million diabetics respectively).
In the case of Western Europe, though there has been an increase in overall rates of diabetes in many countries between 1980 and 2014, the increase has largely been due to ageing population.
There is a very slim chance of meeting the UN global target of halting the rise in diabetes and obesity (against the 2010 baseline) by 2025 if current trends in the rates of diabetes, which are rising quickly in China, India, and many other low- and middle-income countries, continues.
India faces a double whammy with increasing prevalence of obesity and underweight population. According to an April 2, 2016 paper in The Lancet, ranked 19th in the world in 1975, India had only 0.4 million obese men and 0.8 million obese women. But in 2014, the number shot up to 9.8 million obese men and 20 million obese women; Indian men and women occupied the 5th and 3rd rank respectively in the world in 2014.
With 0.1 million, Indian women were ranked 35th in the severely obese category in 1975 but shot up to 8th position in 2014 with 3.7 million severely obese women.
If the number of obese men and women is increasing in India, it ranks number one in the case of underweight adults. According to The Lancet, the number of underweight men in India increased from 61.4 million in 1975 to 101.8 million in 2014. The number of underweight women in India increased from 58.3 million in 1975 to 100.5 million in 2014.
As a result of the huge number of underweight men and women in the country, India’s percentage contribution to global underweight was also very high. India contributed to nearly 38 per cent of global underweight men in 1975 and 46.2 per cent in 2014. In the case of women, India contributed to nearly 33.4 per cent of global underweight women in 1975 and 41.6 per cent in 2014.
Source: The Hindu, 9-04-2016