Scientists without a scientific temper
India has not produced any Nobel Prize winner in science in the last 85
years — largely because of the lack of a scientific environment in the
country
Jawaharlal Nehru coined the term ‘scientific temper’ in his book The Discovery of India,
which was published in 1946. He was also the President of the
Association of Scientific Workers of India (ASWI), which was registered
as a Trade Union, and with which I was closely associated with in the
1940s and the early 1950s. (This may be the only example of a Prime
Minister of a democracy being the President of a Trade Union.) One of
the objectives of ASWI was to propagate scientific temper. It was very
active in the beginning, but fizzled out by the 1960s as the bulk of
scientists in the country, including many who were occupying high
positions, were themselves not committed to scientific temper which
calls for rationality, reason and lack of belief in any dogma,
superstition or manifest falsehood.
The conclusion that our very own scientists — who would be expected
to be leaders in the development of scientific temper — did not possess
scientific temper themselves and were just as superstitious as any other
group was supported by another incident in 1964. Following a statement
by Satish Dhawan (who later became Secretary, Department of Space),
Abdur Rahman (a distinguished historian of science) and I, set up an
organisation called The Society for Scientific Temper, in January 1964,
the founding members of which included distinguished scientists like Francis Crick, a Nobel Prize winner.
For membership to the society, the following statement had to be signed:
“
I believe that knowledge can be acquired only through human endeavour
and not through revelation, and that all problems can and must be faced
in terms of man’s moral and intellectual resources without invoking
supernatural powers.”
We were disillusioned when we approached scientist after scientist
and all of them refused to sign the statement. Clearly they were devoid
of scientific temper. Following this disillusionment, I persuaded
Professor Nurul Hasan, then Education Minister, to have the following
clause included in Article 51A in the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution
in 1976: “It shall be the duty of every citizen of Indian “to develop
the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of enquiry and reform.”
This should have woken up our scientists and reminded them of their duty vis-à-vis
scientific temper, but I do not believe that the situation in this
respect is any better, even today, than what it was 50-60 years ago. Let
me cite three examples.
Little improvement
During the previous Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, then
Human Resources Development Minister Murli Manohar Joshi asked the
University Grants Commission to issue a circular to all universities
stating that they should start a degree course in astrology. For this,
he said, a special grant would be given. My colleague Chandana
Chakrabarti and I filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging this dispensation. Our lawyer was Prashant Bhushan.
The petition was admitted but was eventually dismissed (as could be
expected), for belief in astrology — which is totally unscientific and
irrational and has been repeatedly shown to be a myth — is widespread,
with those who dispense justice also not being immune to it. Not one
scientist came forward in support of us; nor did any of the six national
science academies we have, on which a substantial amount of public
funds are spent every year. Our supporters, who even sent us unsolicited
funds to fight the case, were all non-scientists. In fact, recognising
the above inadequacies of our science academies and their insensitivity
to science-related social problems in general, I resigned from the
fellowship of three of our science academies in 1993.
The second example would be the silence of our scientists and the six
science academies when, last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while
addressing a group of scientists in Mumbai, claimed that organ
transplantation was known in ancient India — he gave Ganesha with his
elephant head and human torso as an example.
The third example would be the much publicised symposium on “Ancient
Sciences through Sanskrit” at the 102nd Indian Science Congress in
Mumbai, which was held earlier this month. At this meeting, it was said
that India had jumbo aircraft (60 x 60 feet; in some cases 200 feet
long) that flew between continents and planets 9,000 years ago (some
4,500 years before Harappa and Mohenjo-daro). Not only that, it was also
claimed that we had a radar system better than the present one, based on the principle that every
animate or inanimate object emits energy all the time. And in the 21st
century, “fusion of science and spirituality will happen because of the
law of inter-penetration,” it was said. I doubt if any serious academic
would have heard of this law which would not make any sense. These and
many other absurd claims made at the symposium were an insult to the
several real scientific accomplishments of ancient and medieval India.
Winding up academies
None of our so-called scientists of note and scientific academies has
raised a voice against these claims. Surely, the distinguished
scientists who organised the Science Congress knew what was likely to be
said at the symposium, but, perhaps, they believed in it all or were
pressurised politically. Therefore, there is a strong case for the
annual Indian Science Congress to be banned (as I also argued in my
article in The Hindu, “Why the Indian Science Congress meets
should be stopped” (Open Page, September 30, 1997), or its name to be
changed to Indian Anti-science Congress.
As regards the science academies, they can easily be wound up without
any damage being caused to Indian science. India has not produced any
Nobel Prize winner in science in the last 85 years – largely because of
the lack of a scientific environment in the country, of which scientific
temper would be an important component.
Pushpa M. Bhargava is the founder-director of the Centre for Cellular
and Molecular Biology at Hyderabad, and chairman of the Southern
Regional Centre of Council for Social Development.)
Source: The Hindu, 17-01-2017