Followers

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Gender & Society: Table of Contents

Volume 33 Issue 1, February 2019
First Published December 6, 2018; pp. 5–18
Full Access
First Published October 12, 2018; pp. 19–40
Full Access
First Published December 28, 2018; pp. 41–63
Full Access
First Published September 11, 2018; pp. 64–93
Correction:Corrigendum
Full Access
First Published October 5, 2018; pp. 94–122
Full Access
First Published November 2, 2018; pp. 123–147

Book Reviews

Full Access
First Published July 5, 2018; pp. 148–150
Full Access
First Published July 2, 2018; pp. 150–152
Full Access
First Published July 2, 2018; pp. 152–154
Full Access
First Published July 2, 2018; pp. 154–156
Full Access
First Published July 9, 2018; pp. 157–159
Full Access
First Published July 19, 2018; pp. 159–160
Full Access
First Published August 20, 2018; pp. 160–163
Full Access
First Published August 22, 2018; pp. 163–165
Full Access
First Published October 3, 2018; pp. 165–167

Corrigendum

Full Access
First Published November 5, 2018; pp. NP1–NP1
Original Article:

India will lead the way in reining in social media misinformation

Whether through suo moto action by companies or executive action, India is setting the tone of discourse on the issue

is founder of Siana Capital, a venture fund management company focused on deep science and tech in India
The news last week was focused on a parliamentary panel in India summoning Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter, to appear before it by this month’s end. Twitter claimed an earlier summons was issued with insufficient notice. However, now two weeks should be enough time for Dorsey to juggle his schedule.
It appears that there was broad consensus within the parliamentary panel, with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and the main opposition party Congress closing ranks. The heart of the issue is whether social media organizations such as Twitter can choose to either throttle or promote specific content on their apps. The ability to do so would place these organizations on par with media houses that are involved in news promotion. Without this ability, they can claim to be solely platforms for social interaction and little else, with no responsibility for content. If, however, they are media houses, the rules of the game change significantly and they can be held accountable for the content their sites carry. With general elections around the corner, this issue takes on further importance.
This debate is not new, nor is it confined to India. Firms such as Facebook and Google have been subjected to scrutiny in the US, with their top brass being summoned by the US legislatures for hearings about their role in the spread of misinformation during the 2016 US presidential elections.
They have also been scrutinised in another realm: the use of personal data. Google has, just a couple of weeks ago, been fined $57 million by France’s data protection watchdog, known as the CNIL. While the amount may seem small in comparison to the multibillion-dollar fines levied on it in the past for alleged antitrust (monopoly) behaviour, this fine is the largest yet after Europe came out with its revised General Data Protection Regulation last year. The fine was levied for the lack of user consent for targeted advertising. CNIL has said that Google failed to fully disclose to users how their personal information is collected and what happens to it after its collection. CNIL found that Google also did not properly obtain users’ consent for the purpose of showing them personalized ads.
Since Europe has taken the lead in privacy regulation, it appears that the rest of the world will follow, with localized legislation to achieve more or less the same effect. As targeted advertising is at the heart of the business model for firms such as Facebook and Google, Europe is setting a precedent to the reining in of Big Tech’s suspected misuse of private data.
While Europe may be the leader with respect to data privacy, it appears that India will lead the way for the rest of the world with respect to checking the spread of misinformation on social interaction platforms (or indeed, media houses, as the case may be). India’s action last year to rein in the spread of “viral” videos and other content on WhatsApp, a messaging platform owned by Facebook, led WhatsApp to make significant changes in the way users could spread information on the app. WhatsApp CEO Chris Daniels made the trek to India last year to meet Ravi Shankar Prasad, the minister for information technology.
In a blog post dated 19 July 2018, WhatsApp announced that it was launching a test to limit forwarding that will apply to everyone using the app. For the rest of the world, that limit on forwarding was set to 20, but according to the blog, “In India— where people forward more messages, photos, and videos than any other country in the world, we’ll also test a lower limit of 5 chats at once and we’ll remove the quick forward button next to media messages.”
In a small footnote to the same blog on 21 January this year—approximately four weeks ago— WhatsApp announced that it had “carefully evaluated” its test and listened to user feedback, and found that the forwarding limit had significantly reduced forwarded messages around the globe. The test has apparently been so successful that starting 21 January, the India-based limit of five forwards has been applied to all WhatsApp users across the globe.
WhatsApp said that it feels that limiting forwarding to only five chats at once will help keep it “focused on private messaging with close contacts”. It claims to be going back to its roots as a private messaging app, a simple, secure and reliable way to communicate with friends and family. Its India experience set the tone for this worldwide action.
Meanwhile, during the current fracas with Twitter, it has become apparent that the firm does not have empowered executives in India who can represent the firm’s policies and procedures to the Indian parliamentary panel. I have little doubt that we will soon see the Twitter CEO in India, considering that Twitter users here represent at least 10% of its user base. In addition, it is likely that Twitter, like WhatsApp before it, will appoint a head for its Indian operation, with sufficient empowerment to deal with the parliamentary panel’s demands and, more importantly, a seat at the top table at Twitter’s headquarters in the US.
Like Europe did with personal data, India will lead the way in reining in social media misinformation, whether through forced suo moto action by these companies or through executive action.

Source: Mintepaper, 19/02/2019 (14-15)

What is 'Smoke detector principle' in Psychology


This refers to the idea that the human brain is designed by nature to be paranoid as a defence mechanism to protect itself from possible dangers that could be fatal to its chances of survival. While paranoia can lead the brain to commit a lot of false positive errors, it can, however, help human beings avoid a number of false negative errors which could turn out to be extremely costly as well. This is similar to the way a smoke detector is designed by engineers, who want the device to never miss an actual fire even if such a design causes the device to raise a number of false alarms. The term was coined by American physician Randolph M. Nesse in a 2006 paper.

Source: The Hindu, 19/02/2019

UPSC Civil Services 2019 application begins today for IAS IFS exam, notification, important dates and other details here

UPSC Civil Service IAS IPS 2019 registration begins on February 19. Check all important details regarding exam dates, eligibility, exam pattern etc here.

UPSC civil services exam 2019: The online registration of Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) will begin from February 19, 2019. UPSC will release its official notification anytime today and begin its online application process from February 19, 2019. The dates as mentioned in the official calendar of UPSC include February 19 as the commencement of application while March 18 is the last date to apply.
The civil services examination (CSE) 2019 preliminary level will be conducted on June 2, 2019.
Candidates interested for UPSC IAS/ IPS/ IFS can apply for the examination online. The application forms will be uploaded online at the official website of UPSC at upsc.gov.in.
The main examination for UPSC civil services exam will be conducted on September 20 which will be held for five days. The main examination for UPSC Indian Forest Service (IFS) will be conducted on December 1, 2019. The IFS main exam will be conducted for 10 days.

UPSC Eligibility
To apply for the UPSC CSE 2019, applicant must have qualified graduation level course or its equivalent from a recognised university/ institution.
UPSC Recruitment Process
The UPSC recruitment consists of a three-level exam including prelims, main and interview. Candidates have to qualify all three levels.
UPSC Exam Pattern
The Civil Services Preliminary exam comprises of two compulsory papers of 200 marks each (General Studies Paper I and General Studies Paper II). The questions will be of multiple choice, objective type. The marks in prelims will not be counted for final ranking, but just for qualification for the main exam.
The main exam has 1750 marks while interview has 275 marks. The final selection would be based on Merit score of main and interview round combined
Source: Hindustan Times, 19/02/2019

India’s law and policy need women’s perspectives

The way forward is multi-pronged: shaping women voters as a bloc, exhorting political parties, and capacitating women in elections.

Ninety percent of the Lok Sabha that legislated the Good and Services Tax (GST) on sanitary napkins in 2016 had never had a period. Surrogacy was legislated by those for whom pregnancy is an impossibility. Instant Triple Talaq had not one Muslim woman voting.
Law and policy in India are in dire need of women’s perspectives. Lived experiences are so divergent and distinct on many issues that men cannot represent women. The same also argues for a diversity of women themselves in the Houses. Women must have half the seats at the highest political tables simply because they are half the population. There is no entry criteria for representation; it is not earned for being the better, brighter or busier; it is entitled by mere existence. Still, 67 years later, with barely 10% women Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) & Members of Parliament (MPs), the bugle for a Women’s Reservation Bill inexorably sounds since patience for organic improvement has worn down to a nub. Reservation is an item of last resort; so quota is not what women want for themselves but rather, quota is what women need against party men’s usurpations.
In a nation where every demographic has a caste or community lobby, women, though comprising 50%, have no political potency since they are disaggregated. India is one of those few democracies without a caucus for advancing women’s political power. This is when initiatives like Shakti step in. A national, non partisan and inclusive citizen’s collective, it has a singular goal of increasing the number of women MLAs and MPs. Working across party ideologies, caste, class and religious differences, it is a neutral, volunteer-led platform.
The Call Your MPs campaign on December 27 was a historic first, which saw farmers, corporate women, rape survivors, students, rehabilitated manual scavengers, women in media, civil society, domestic workers etc., ring all MPs across India to pass a Women’s Reservation Bill. 127 of the 130 that answered from Kashmir to Lakshadweep said yes and, indeed, they raised it in the Winter Session but were not entertained. A pan-India Call Women MLAs campaign followed on January 21. 105 of the 112 women MLAs, who responded from across India and its parties, admitted that parties do not field enough women, and 50% should be the norm.
While these demands might seem exorbitant, they are morally the right democratic action. These dialogues between the public and their elected representatives are a massive, rare exercise in participatory democracy. Citizens raising the demand is the bare minimum for change, and pressure tactics make parties aware that voters are watching. They also embolden aspiring women politicians since people are rooting for them.
Sushmita Dev (MP, AIMC President), Lalitha Kumaramangalam (ex NCW, BJP), Divya Spandana (Social Media Chief, INC), Shaina NC (BJP Spokesperson), Kanimozhi (RS MP DMK), Bhartruhari Mahtab (MP BJD), Kavitha Krishnan (AIPWA Sec, CPI-ML) and others will lead deliberations on the issue of women’s reservations in Delhi.
The way forward is multipronged: shaping women voters as a bloc; exhorting political parties; and capacitating women in elections. There is no unitary solution and delivering women’s political representation is entirely up to India. How badly do we want alternatives to today’s toxic politics? What are we willing to do about it? While not trying is definite failure, sustained grassroots movements that echo across India may seem like a butterfly flapping its wings today, but could trigger a tsunami in the political landscape tomorrow.
Tara Krishnaswamy is a software director. She is co-founder of the NGO, Shakti, a citizen’s collective working on political power for women
Source: Hindustan Times, 19/02/2019