Followers

Wednesday, April 03, 2019

Challenge of managing solid waste in our cities requires community engagement

Vellore, with a population of five lakh, has been a trailblazer in decentralised management of solid waste and sending no waste to landfills. It has earned the remarkable distinction of getting its residents to separate wet waste from dry waste.

We wrote in our last column, ‘Small town, cleaner future’ (IE, February 27) about how small towns in India are showing the way in keeping wet waste separate from dry waste. This is the most critical first step for sound solid waste management. We also looked to see if some bigger towns are getting their act together in managing their solid waste. Admittedly, it is more difficult to organise community action in large towns. But wards are a good place to start, and we are happy to report some encouraging news from Tamil Nadu.
Vellore city in Tamil Nadu, with a population of five lakh, has been a trailblazer in decentralised management of solid waste and sending no waste to landfills. More recently, it has earned the remarkable distinction of getting all its residents to separate their wet waste from dry waste, which makes the task of solid waste management so much easier for the municipal corporation.Vellore generates 160 tonnes of solid waste per day, excluding waste from bulk generators. It all began with a PIL in the National Green Tribunal in 2015 seeking closure of the eight-acre dumpsite on a tank bund in Saduperi, a few kilometres away from Vellore. The site had been used for dumping mixed waste since 1991.
Vellore Municipal Corporation (VMC) responded to the challenge by building 42 sheds for micro composting centres (MCCs) across its 60 wards. Each MCC (with a capacity ranging from 1.5 to 5 tonnes) was provided enclosed sheds containing numerous open-brickwork tanks (5 ft deep, 5-6 ft wide and 7-10 ft long) for composting wet waste: The tanks are filled in rotation, over a starter bed of dry leaves, with one-foot layers of hand-sorted wet waste plus a layer of cow dung-slurry as a compost starter, and allowed to mature for 30-60 days.
Last month, one of us led a group of 10, driving from Bengaluru to Vellore to see for ourselves how the VMC was implementing its decentralised waste management system. At a particular MCC, we were pleased to see fully segregated wet waste being hand-picked to remove coconut shells and other hard-to-compost items, on the one hand, and clean dry waste carefully sorted into different bins for sale, on the other.
Municipal commissioner at that time, Janaki Raveendran, with support from all elected local representatives, proactively and completely stopped sending any waste to the dumpsite. They started doorstep collection of mixed waste in Vellore, using primary collection vehicles and municipal workers to transport the waste to the MCCs: These are run by self-help groups who are provided with covered space for sorting, and are paid Rs 250 per day. They can collectively keep the sale proceeds of both the compost and dry waste, and VMC pays for electricity and water. There is no secondary transport, no transfer stations for the garbage and no black spots in the city, not to speak of the significant savings made on transport cost.

The second major step of 100 per cent segregation came with the enthusiastic efforts of S Sivasubramanian who assumed charge as municipal commissioner of VMC on October 31, 2018. Having inherited a well-functioning system of decentralised waste management, the new commissioner was determined to achieve doorstep collection of waste, fully segregated at source, as he had done in his earlier posting in Tirunelveli. And, this has been achieved in Vellore in just four months. This should give food for thought to many of those who believe it can’t be done in India. It is being done — in the South, but there is no reason why the North cannot follow suit.
There was also an awareness campaign, which involved the municipal commissioner of Vellore and other high officials leveraging social media by posting photos of themselves in their home kitchens with separate bins for wet and dry waste. All municipal staff and waste workers down to the lowest level, and all government employees, were urged to keep their home wastes unmixed before asking others to do so. Religious leaders of different communities were also approached and urged to convey to their followers the importance of keeping wet and dry wastes unmixed and to avoid from January 2019 the use of one-time-use plastics which have been banned by the Tamil Nadu government. Groups like the Lions and Rotary were roped in to spread the good word. Schools were required to get pledges signed by all students and their parents. With the cooperation of teachers, they have reached out to 1,28,000 homes.
Such campaigns to engage with the community are successful only when the doorstep collection teams cooperate and strictly refuse taking mixed waste. After accepting the segregated waste, they should visibly transport the wet and dry waste — separately — to gain the trust of those who have complied, by not mixing the wastes at source. The pending grievances of waste collectors with respect to promotions, filling vacancies, provident fund issues and minor repairs of primary collection vehicles, etc. were resolved to ensure their buy-in for the campaign. This shows leadership in making change happen.
Micro-planning of collection vehicle routes manned by municipal staff, and tracking their punctuality and performance, is also key to citizen cooperation. The benefit of such intense focus is that once initial success is achieved for the project, it is relatively easy to maintain the system. Prolonged deadlines for compliance, one area at a time, do not work.
At a morning muster, sanitary officers give each waste collector a notebook containing a message from the municipal commissioner, which they have to show to each household on their beat. They also need to collect a signed pledge to not mix their wastes and not use banned plastic: This is also to promote bonding with the households. After two warnings, mixed waste is temporarily accepted on payment of a fee of Rs 10. Thereafter, mixed waste pickup is strictly refused, with the full backing of the superior officers of the doorstep collectors. A follow-up visit is made the same evening to the defaulter household to find out where their uncollected waste went.
The Tamil Nadu government has provided an enabling environment through proactive engagement of the Department of Municipal Administration. The courts have also provided strong support for decentralised waste management. Under the leadership of G Prakash, commissioner of municipal administration in Tamil Nadu, 700 plus MCCs and several on-site composting centres have come up, all receiving well-segregated waste. As in Vellore, so in 19 other cities, no waste goes to a dumpsite. Statewide, wet waste is collected six days a week and dry waste only on Wednesdays. Municipalities have framed by-laws to comply with Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016. Thus, user charges starting from Rs 20 per month are added every six months to property tax, with collection rates of 80-100 per cent. Bulk generators managing their own waste are charged for collection of dry waste and for the waste they indirectly generate at local markets, eateries, etc. As a result of the plastic ban, the volume of total solid waste has come down from 160 to 131 tonnes a day.
This model can work equally well in every ward of a metro city. The collective challenge of managing solid waste in our metros requires, above all, the engagement of the community.
This article first appeared in the print edition on April 3, 2019 under the title ‘How a city cleans up’. Ahluwalia is chairperson of Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER). Patel is member, Supreme Court committee on solid waste management.
Source: Indian Express, 3/04/2019

Of Oneness and Infinity


Yama, Lord of Death, while talking to Nachiketa about truth in the Katha Upanishad, explains, “Truth, Atman or Self is too subtle to be attained through mere intellectual debates. The Self in subtler than subtle, greater than the greatest, and it dwells in the heart of each human being. It is only the Self which is active and also inactive. The Self is the basis of all forms of existence. This means that whatever exists in the universe springs from it. Who is better able to know God than the Self, as He resides in Self ?” Yama describes the Atman as the Lord of a chariot and the body as the chariot. One’s wisdom represents the driver and mind, the reins. He said the man whose wisdom fails to distinguish between good and pleasant and is carried away by his senses, loses control and moves on the road to perdition. The Atman of this eternal body represents the Paramatman, or the Almighty. The head, which is the governing organ of a body, the root of all thoughts and actions, represents Brahma the Creator. The two arms, which execute all actions of this body, represent Vishnu the Preserver and Shiva the Destroyer. Fingers represent various devtas, and they are responsible for various tasks of nature. Like a body with its own immune system, this universal structure has immunity of its own, making it self-rectifiable. Although all the organs of a body are different from each other, responsible for different tasks, they are useless in individuality. The interdependence of infinite elements of the universe makes this structure and the Lord, infinite.

Source: Economic Times, 3/04/2019

Tuesday, April 02, 2019

Journal of Human Trafficking: Table of Contents


Article
Pages: 91-108
Published online: 08 Dec 2017
  • 83Views
  • 1CrossRef citations
  • 1Altmetric
Article
Pages: 109-129
Published online: 15 Jan 2018
  • 311Views
  • 0CrossRef citations
  • 3Altmetric
Article
Pages: 130-150
Published online: 15 Jan 2018
  • 240Views
  • 0CrossRef citations
  • 2Altmetric
Article
Pages: 151-164
Published online: 20 Mar 2018
  • 200Views
  • 0CrossRef citations
  • 2Altmetric
Article
Pages: 165-175
Published online: 27 Mar 2018
  • 114Views
  • 2CrossRef citations
  • 2Altmetric
Book Reviews

Row over Javed Akhtar’s lyrics shows how producers defeat copyright laws

It is important to think beyond the politics of the present controversy and make efforts to protect the creators who bring melody and colour to our lives.

A recent tweet by lyricist Javed Akhtar, claiming he was credited as songwriter for a film he didn’t work on — PM Narendra Modi — raises some fundamental questions about the Indian copyright law. Whom should Indian copyright law primarily protect? The artist who created a work or the person who acquired certain economic rights from the artist through an assignment or license?
Akhtar claims that his name was specifically included in the film poster without his knowledge or permission and he tweeted “Am shocked to find my name on the poster of this film. Have not written any songs for it!” The film’s producer, Sandip Singh, responded by tweeting, “We have taken the songs ‘Ishwar Allah’ from the film 1947:Earth and the song ‘Suno Gaur Se Duniya Walon’ from the film Dus in our film, thus we have given the due credits to respective lyricists Javed Sahab and Sameer Ji. @TSeries is our Music partner. @ModiTheFilm2019”.
Both tweets generated political heat on Twitter, but it is important to look at some key legal and policy questions, crucially, whether Akhtar has a right under the Indian copyright law to not be named as a lyricist in a movie that he does not wish to be associated with.
Under the Indian copyright law, there are two kinds of rights for creators — economic rights and non-economic rights. Economic rights comprise a bundle of rights including the right to reproduce, distribute and perform the work in public. These rights are assignable, transferrable, and waivable. Non-economic rights granted to the creators are generally known as “moral rights”. Under Indian copyright law, they are referred to as “Author’s Special Rights”, and includes right of attribution and right of integrity. The former is the right to be attributed as the author of a work, while the latter is the right to restrain or claim damages in respect of any distortion, mutilation, modification, or other act in relation to that work, if such acts would be prejudicial to her honour or reputation.
Moral rights under Indian copyright law are non-assignable, that is, creators cannot give away those moral rights to anyone through a contract. Unlike economic rights, they are also perpetual in character: Which means moral rights protection extends even beyond the term of copyright protection. While it is debatable whether perpetual moral rights protection is good for promoting creativity, it is important to note that one may not find a similarly strong moral rights position in many other jurisdictions. If one looks at the history of Indian copyright law, it can be seen that India consciously opted for a strong moral rights position in the first post-independence copyright legislation, deviating from the British approach which is reflected in most other parts of the Indian copyright law. Part of the reason could be the influence of freedom fighters like Gandhi, who were very keen on protecting the integrity of their works.
One of the important facets of moral rights is the right not to be named as an author, particularly in a scenario wherein the author considers that a modified version of her work would be detrimental to her honour or reputation. If one looks at cases wherein moral rights-related provisions have been invoked, it can be seen that the Indian judiciary has recognised this important aspect. The direction of the Delhi High Court to remove the name of the novelist Mannu Bhandari from the credits of the 1986 movie Samay ki Dhara, which was an attempt to adapt her novel Aap ka Bunty, is an example. In this context, it is important to ask ourselves whether we should deny the right of a creator to not be mentioned as a lyricist in a movie which she doesn’t want to be associated with or which she considers as prejudicial to her honour or reputation.
This question is also relevant in the context of the legal provisions on assignment of economic rights. While addressing the practical requirements of copyright assignment, lawmakers have taken note of the fact that creators are often forced to give away all their rights without adequate remuneration due to the imbalance in bargaining power. Indian copyright law has tried to address this issue through protective provisions. Restrictions introduced through an amendment in 2012 on assignments by a lyricist or composer for songs synchronised in a movie deserve special attention. Lyricists and composers are not allowed to assign or waive the right to receive royalties on an equal basis with copyright assignee, except for playing the music along with the film in a cinema hall. The amendment has also clarified that any agreement to the contrary shall be void. The only exceptions are for legal heirs of authors, and copyright societies established for the collection and distribution of royalties on behalf of creators. While that amendment was in the context of the right to receive royalties, the intention of legislators to protect lyricists and composers from undue exploitation of producers is very clear: This amendment was also a result of the efforts of Akhtar as a Member of Rajya Sabha.
However, the current controversy is an example of how economically powerful producers often try to defeat the creator-centric approach of India’s copyright law. It is important to think beyond the politics of the present controversy and make efforts to protect the creators who bring melody and colour to our lives.
Source: Indian Express, 2/04/2019
This article first appeared in the print edition on April 2, 2019, under the title ‘Where credit isn’t due’. The writer is assistant professor at National Law University, Delhi

How India can balance emission and growth

To meet its climate targets, the country must invest heavily in eco-friendly transport, power generation and buildings.

The Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ( UNFCCC) requires countries to set targets called Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) that would help the world collectively move toward curtailing the temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius and that can set the world on a low-carbon, climate-resilient future pathway. India made ambitious commitments and the two fundamental elements of India’s NDCs are 33-35% reduction in emission intensity of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2030 compared to 2005 levels and a conditional increase in the cumulative share of non-fossil fuel energy in installed capacity up to 40% by 2030.
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) in its series of research based policy analysis of NDC have said time and again that these two pillars to achieving the NDC goals in countries such as India require early uptake of advance climate-friendly technologies, while appreciating the level of ambition.
This study by International Energy Agency (IEA) released last week questions the ambition of these targets and the level of effort put in by governments towards achieving these targets. Reducing the carbon intensity of electricity generation requires that non-fossil fuel-based power generation should grow at a higher rate than fossil fuel-based power. Even though Indian government is pushing renewable energy generation through focused missions and schemes, reducing the share of fossil fuels would require comparatively larger capacity installation of non-fossil-fuel power systems (other than nuclear and hydro power) in order to meet the increasing demand for electricity due to higher projected growth. That is going to be an uphill task for India.
Estimates made by the government indicate that India could achieve part of its NDC goals more than a decade earlier than targeted, based on the impetus on renewable energy. But a question still remains over the future of coal. India’s National Electricity Plan (NEP), adopted earlier in 2018, is aimed to guide India to remain on track to achieving the renewable energy pillar of the Paris Agreement targets ahead of its time. It could potentially also become a global leader in combating climate change if it were to abandon plans to build new coal-fired power plants. The draft NEP contained no expansion of coal power after 2022, however the final NEP took a step backward and included more than 90 GW of planned coal-fired capacity, with an added risk of these becoming stranded assets. So coal in India is here to stay in India defining its development pathway, but that’s not the only defining element as it used to be a few decades ago.
A 2018 report by the national coal mining company, Coal India, confirms declining future costs of solar and renewable electricity storage (Coal India, 2018), which is likely to foster low-carbon investments. Investment in renewable power in India topped fossil fuels for the first time in 2017, according to the IEA, which is a consolation even in the wake of this current study by IEA. Therefore, with sustained growth, larger upfront investments in new transport infrastructure, buildings and power sector will be critical to India achieving its NDC targets.
Vidya Soundarajan is India regional programme manager, Action on Climate Today
Source: Hindustan Times, 2/04/2019

Think About It: What Makes A Good Life?


 A great career, financial success, a nice family, loads of friends, an active social life and exciting holidays make a good life, right? Think again. Often, i have admired the cheerfulness and tranquillity of many of the security guards, cleaners and gardeners at our building. They arrive at work earlier than required, are always very willing to help and they do it with a smile. I have chatted with a couple of them at times and found their approach to life a reminder of what makes a good life. Firstly, true quality of life is a reflection not of our standard of living but how we experience life within. Secondly, it is a measure of our level of freedom from our volatile emotionalmental states; how well we win over our frequent feelings of anxiety, fear and envy or craving for a different life. I have noticed three principles that contribute to such a good life. 1. Morality: We cannot be at peace or experience emotional freedom without a clear conscience. A high sense of moral integrity is important for a healthy inner life. Without strength of character, we can easily compromise on ‘minor’ infractions on integrity. We tell white lies, choose convenience over righteousness and assume that the end somehow justifies the means. It doesn’t! The emotional residue of any wrongdoing stays and accumulates in our psyche and manifests itself in one negative emotion or other. For example, guilt results in anxiety, irritability and low self-esteem. Immoral conduct in business or personal life corrupts and weakens us. Choosing to do the right thing strengthens our inner being. 2. Inner compass: To experience emotional freedom, it’s important to live life on our own terms. We feel free when we align our life to our innate traits, core values and our life’s calling. We carry enormous emotional baggage when we are trying to live a life that we believe others expect us to. One of the biggest reasons for stress in our lives is our constant propensity to compare ourselves with others. Living by our inner compass relies on feeling grateful for and at peace with who we are and our circumstances. We don’t crave for a different life and choose not to compare ourselves, our life or our progress, with others. 3. Wisdom around control: One of the factors contributing to our inner suffering is our desire to control outcomes – from advancement at work and children’s future to longevity and others’ perception of us. Being focussed on goals and doing our best to reach them is healthy. However, with our high achievement-orientation, we routinely obsess about the outcomes. That significantly increases our emotional burden. Wise people know the delicate balance between willpower and letting go. They do their best on what’s in their control and are wise enough to let go of the temptation to worry about what’s not in their control. That’s what can help us overcome our constant yearning for favourable outcomes and fully enjoy the present. It also helps us be compassionate towards ourselves, our colleagues and loved ones. As you may notice, these principles, while not necessarily easy to live by, are great social equalisers. They are within the reach of almost anyone, irrespective of their financial or social status. That’s how some of the staff in my building are happy and peaceful and lead a good inner life. I guess, you and i can, too

Source: Times of India, 2/04/2019