“We cannot become what we need to be by remaining what we are.”
Max Depree
“हम जो हैं वही बने रहकर वह नहीं बन सकते जो कि हम बनना चाहते हैं।”
मैक्स डेप्री
“We cannot become what we need to be by remaining what we are.”
Max Depree
“हम जो हैं वही बने रहकर वह नहीं बन सकते जो कि हम बनना चाहते हैं।”
मैक्स डेप्री
Apart from holding the rank of India’s education minister, Abul kalam Azad donned many hats of being a journalist, freedom fighter, politician, and educationist. Here are five lesser-known facts about the late education minister who transformed the education system of India.
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was born in Saudi Arabia
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was born in Mecca, Saudi Arabia in 1888. His mother was an Arab and the daughter of Sheikh Mohammad Zaher Watri and Azad’s father, Maulana Khairuddin, was a Bengali Muslim of Afghan origins who came to Arab during the Sepoy Mutiny and proceeded to Mecca and settled there. He came back to Calcutta with his family in 1890 when Abul Kalam was two years old.
Abul Kalam was homeschooled and knew many languages
Azad pursued traditional Islamic education. He was taught at home, first by his father and later by appointed teachers who were eminent in their respective fields. Azad learned Arabic and Persian first and then philosophy, geometry, mathematics and algebra. He also learned English, world history, and politics through self-study. Azad also knew Hindustani, Hindi and English languages.
Started two weekly journals – Al-Hilal and Al-Balagh to promote Hindu-Muslim unity
In 1912, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad started a weekly journal in Urdu called Al-Hilal to increase the revolutionary recruits amongst the Muslims. Al-Hilal played an important role in forging Hindu-Muslim unity after the bad blood created between the two communities in the aftermath of Morley-Minto reforms. Al-Hilal became a revolutionary mouthpiece ventilating extremist views. ‘The government regarded Al- Hilal as a propagator of secessionist views and banned it in 1914.
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad then started another weekly called Al-Balagh with the same mission of propagating Indian nationalism and revolutionary ideas based on Hindu-Muslim unity. In 1916, the government banned this paper too and expelled Maulana Abul Kalam Azad from Calcutta and exiled him to Bihar from where he was released after the First World War 1920.
Youngest person to serve as the President of the Indian National Congress
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad supported Non-Cooperation Movement started by Gandhiji and entered Indian National Congress in 1920. He was elected as the president of the special session of the Congress in Delhi (1923). At an age of 35, he became the youngest person to serve as the President of the Indian National Congress.
Maulana Azad was arrested in 1930 for violation of the salt laws as part of Gandhiji’s Salt Satyagraha. He was put in Meerut jail for a year and a half. After his release, he again became the president of Congress in 1940 (Ramgarh) and remained in the post till 1946.
Founder of Jamia Milia Islamia University
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was one of the founding members of the Jamia Milia Islamia University, originally established at Aligarh in the United Provinces, India in 1920.
He is responsible for shaping the modern education system of the country. The first IIT, IISc, School of Planning and Architecture and the University Grants Commission were established under his tenure as the education minister. The most prominent cultural, literary academies were also built including the Sangeet Natak Academy, Lalit Kala Academy, Sahitya Academy as well as the Indian Council for Cultural Relations.
Source: Indian Express, 11/11/21
Movies based on the real-life struggles of marginalised groups are rare in mainstream Indian cinema. T J Gnanavel’s Jai Bhim is amongst the few that engages with issues of identity and institutionalised discrimination with some sincerity. It is based on the true story of the struggle of Parvathi (Sengani in the movie), an Irula woman, to find and secure justice for her husband, who is arrested and tortured in police custody in a false case of theft, only to disappear from custody later.
Jai Bhim has a powerful cast with Suriya playing the protagonist, based on the communist lawyer-turned-judge, K Chandru, Lijomol Jose as Sengani and Manikandan as her husband, Rajakannu. The movie is a portrayal of the life, occupation and culture of the Irula tribe, their aspiration for a better life and education, and the daily exclusions, along with torture and mass incarceration, that they face — all nested in the deeply hierarchical and illiberal democratic structure of Tamil Nadu.
Set in the early 1990s, the movie shows Rajakannu working as a snake catcher in the homes and farms of the very upper-caste landlords who snub and shun him. Yet, the homeless, landless citizenship of the Irulas is not void of hope and draws meaning from their proximity to nature and the protections enshrined in the Constitution.
Justice Chandru makes no bones about his communist leanings in real life and this is shown well in the movie by Gnanavel. The symbolism of the red flag with the hammer and sickle, banners and posters, along with images and statues of Karl Marx are found in the background of various scenes. Justice Chandru hunts down evidence for the custodial murder of Rajakannu and his wrongful arrest for theft, while arguing a habeas corpus petition filed by Sengani in the high court. The depiction of the violence and cruelty faced by the incarcerated Rajakannu and his close relatives is gut-wrenching and the pregnant Sengani’s quest for justice, despite the trauma, is inspiring. The story unfolds as advocate Chandru argues the case and takes on the mighty apparatus of the state as a good cop (played by Prakash Raj) joins the battle for conscience.
Jai Bhim is also a commentary on the masculine nature of the Indian state, its loose structures permeated by the caste and kinship powers that enable and institutionalise discrimination against marginalised groups like Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and even Muslims.
Despite the realism embedded in the movie, one is left wanting more. Does Suriya look like Justice Chandru? Tamil movies could definitely do better to inculcate an appreciation for dark skin and non-mainstream imagery. Another concern is with the portrayal of Left politics. Hugo Gorringe, a sociologist and scholar of Tamil Nadu, suggests that politics is also a game of pragmatism and the Left movements too are under compulsion to adopt pragmatic politics. It is this pragmatism that forced the Left to focus on issues of caste and social exclusion in Tamil Nadu. One is left wondering why the movie is titled Jai Bhim as Ambedkar is neither evoked nor portrayed as the guiding light except once, when Chandru mentions that Ambedkar was sidelined by Gandhi and Nehru.
The current pressures of politics and the resulting pragmatism may need the symbolic presence of Ambedkar, with an Ambedkar being available for everyone. For legal activism and in a legal drama oriented towards social justice, Ambedkar could be more inspiring than Marx as he had believed that the process of civil repair requires smaller and continual revolutions in society and the institutional mechanisms of justice. The quest for justice and power is a continuous process for marginalised groups. As the lyrics of one song in Jai Bhim go:
Take the power in your hand/ Dare to take power in your hand/ You have no choice but that.
We must also stay aware that the Irulas are still waiting for substantive power and their Ambedkar is yet to seize the moment. We need many more movies like Jai Bhim in our struggle for a better world.
Written by Suryakant Waghmore
The writer is professor of sociology at IIT Bombay
Source: Indian Express, 11/11/21
Google’s Drive and Dropbox are two of the most popular options for cloud storage and backup. Which makes sense, because the two platforms compete with each other intensely. Which one is right for you? That’s a complex question, and it comes down to several factors: your budget, your total backup needs, and which platforms you want to use them on.
Unsurprisingly, Google Drive works best if you’re
heavily invested in Google’s other systems: Android, Chrome OS, and the Google
Workspace suite of web apps. It’s also a better value in general. Dropbox is a better choice if
you’re more concerned with speed and performance, and are willing to pay for
it.
Pricing
At the consumer level, both companies offer at
least one approximately comparable plan for cloud storage. Here’s a quick
breakdown of the various plans and prices:
Storage
tier |
Google
Drive/Google One |
Dropbox |
2GB |
– |
Free
(bonuses available) |
15GB |
Free |
– |
100GB |
$2 a
month |
– |
200GB |
$3 a
month |
– |
2TB |
$10 a
month |
$12 a
month (one user only), $20 a month for 6 users |
3TB |
– |
$20 a
month (one user only) |
5TB |
$25 a
month |
$45 per
month/3 user minimum, $15 for each extra user |
10TB |
$50 a
month |
– |
20TB |
$100 a
month |
– |
30TB |
$150 a
month |
– |
Unlimited |
– |
$75 per
month/3 user minimum, $25 for each extra user |
As you can see, Google Drive (also known as Google
One) offers both more initial, free storage, and more and cheaper options at
different levels of storage. Dropbox users can boost their free storage
by getting
friends to sign up with referral codes, up to 16GB. But making
users essentially do your marketing for you to get what’s free elsewhere isn’t
a great value proposition.
Both companies offer discounts for paying yearly
instead of monthly. But in terms of bang for your buck, Dropbox really only
makes sense for individual users who want up to two terabytes of storage, or
for teams of users who need an absolutely huge amount: more than Google Drive’s
maximum 30TB.
Also, while Google allows free users to access Drive from
anywhere and on unlimited devices, Dropbox makes users pay for more than three
devices to have easy access via dedicated apps. You can get
around this limit by using the Dropbox browser tool, but it’s a pretty huge
barrier for free users.
Google also wins out on integration with different platforms.
The Google Drive system is built into most Android phones and tablets, all
Chrome OS-powered devices, and it’s the default way to save files in Google
Docs and other Google Workspace tools. On top of that, Google Drive/One apps
are available on iOS and Windows, allowing for easy uploads and
downloads.
Dropbox is also available pretty much everywhere,
but its integration is less seamless on mobile and Chrome OS. While it’s
possible to upload and download to Dropbox on almost any platform (via the
browser if not a dedicated app), it may take a few more steps. The three-device
limit on a free Dropbox account is a big limiter here, too.
Both Google Drive and Dropbox integrate with a
variety of other often-used services, like Microsoft Office, Slack, Adobe
Creative Cloud, Zoom, et cetera. Dropbox even lets you sign in with a Google or
Apple account, if you like.
Usability
While Google is a clear winner on value, and
they’ve made it easy to access your files on multiple platforms, Dropbox still
has an edge on usability, in my opinion. Google Drive tends to treat its
storage as one big pool of data, and while it has support for the basic
directory system of folders most PC users are used to, the platform would
prefer you to use its built-in search tools.
Dropbox, on the other hand, assumes that you
generally know where you put your stuff, and makes it easy to navigate through
folders and sub-folders either on an app or in a desktop directory. It’s not effortlessly
intuitive, but it’s familiar to anyone who’s been using desktops and laptops
for most of their adult lives. It’s a PC-first approach, rather than the
(perhaps understandable) mobile-style interface of Drive.
Performance
While Google Drive is by no means slow, Dropbox
gets the edge in performance, too. When trying to upload massive amounts of
both large and small data, Dropbox gave me consistently faster upload speeds.
That’s a notable consideration if you plan on hitting your storage hard and
frequently.
Dropbox also has a feature that makes it faster to send files
around your local network: LAN sync. This tool allows files added
to your Dropbox account to start copying over local Ethernet or Wi-Fi connections
even before they’re fully uploaded to the cloud. In practical terms, this makes
a file added on your phone (say, a new photo you took of your pet) appear
almost instantaneously in the Dropbox folder on your Windows or MacOS computer,
so long as both devices are connected to the local network.
It’s a small but crucial advantage if what you’re really looking
for is a bucket of syncing storage that’s quick and easy to access.
As you might expect, Google comes out ahead in terms of sharing
storage between family members. While Google One plans can be shared with up to
five extra family members (for a total of six users) on the cheapest $2 a month
tier, Dropbox only unlocks this option once you start paying $20 a month for
2TB of storage.
Individual files can be shared easily on
both platforms, and there’s not much of a difference between Google Drive and
Dropbox if you’re sharing accounts. But unless you need a truly massive amount
of storage on Dropbox, Google Drive is better in terms of value if you want to
share that storage between two or more users.
Both systems offer tools to back up your
PC’s files to the cloud in a system-wide fashion… sort of. While it’s certainly
possible to treat Google Drive or Dropbox as a cloud backup system, these
platforms really aren’t designed for a regular emergency backup. Their slow
upload speed and cumbersome backup tools put them well behind dedicated
services like Carbonite or Backblaze. I wouldn’t give either one extra points of this
feature. (For more on this topic, see our roundup of the best cloud backup services.)
Extras
On top of the above tools, there are less tangible
advantages to both systems. Purchasing extra Google Drive storage via the
Google One system gets you:
·
Shared space for Gmail
messages/attachments and Google Photos
·
Free access to the Google One VPN on Android
·
Discounts on purchases in the Google
Store
·
Occasional deals on travel and other
items
How about Dropbox? Once again, Dropbox is more
stingy with its tools, unlocking some of its more premium options under more
expensive consumer or business accounts. Even the full text search, a fairly
basic tool that you can perform yourself on local files in just about any OS,
isn’t available at the free tier. Once again Dropbox’s more stingy nature is
hurting it in this comparison.
Google
Drive is the clear winner
While Dropbox has a superior interface and user
experience (at least for people who prefer conventional PC-style file systems),
and its performance and LAN sync tools can leave the competition in the dust,
Google is offering a better product and a better value on almost all other
points of comparison.
From the price of premium storage, to integration
with desktop and mobile operating systems, to less tangible bonuses as part of
the Google One system, Drive is a clear winner. That’s doubly true if you’re
looking to stick to free tools.
Which isn’t to say that Dropbox is necessarily a
bad choice. That extra performance and better interface might be worth it,
especially for users who don’t necessarily need the massive amount of storage
Google offers. Just be aware of the trade-off in value.
Source: PCWorld
“A book is a gift you can open again and again” says Garrison Keillor. My father inculcated and nurtured my reading habit as he took me to local book exhibitions when I was young and made sure that I enrolled myself in the Goa State Central Library, then housed in Institute Menezes Braganza, Panjim. As a kid, as my reading grew, books espoused my curiosity to understand the world better. A study conducted by B Greene in 2001 says it aptly “Reading habit is best formed at a young impressionable age in school, but once formed it can last one’s lifetime”.
Reading encourages sound scholastic development of the mind. The
most direct outcome of the reading is it strengthens vocabulary and leads to a
fluid formation of comprehensible sentences. Reading allows the mind to go
through an assortment of characters, their lives, ambitions, nuances thus
allowing it to weave a story. It empowers and emancipates citizens, and it
brings people together. It helps to form opinions and guide one’s judgements.
It fuels up the imagination and makes us receptive to new ideas. It allows and
fosters re-thinking and questioning about themes to which non-readers cling
without any understanding. It allows one to be empathetic and liberal in
viewing society. Reading is an investment that pays rich dividends in life.
However, reading habit has taken a backseat in this online
world. There are three essential steps for any habit to form: a trigger, the
process and a reward, says Adam Grant. This method has been mastered by the
greatest distractors of all time: the social media giants! The smartphone
notification (the trigger), countless feeds of pictures/videos (the process)
and instant gratification one gets (the reward) fully utilise the caveat of
habit formation. While on the other hand, reading a book or a newspaper compels
the effortful mind to think over facts and assimilate the ideas. Though
development in technology has brought books at our fingertips in the form of
e-books, e-magazines or e-journals, it has been poorly successful in imbibing
the reading habit. This notion is bolstered by the scene of students in the
reading rooms of libraries seen fiddling with the smartphone screens.
The advent of audio books has tried to replace the traditional
methods. Lack of dedicated time (or will for it) for reading has been monetised
by companies that offer books to listen to on the go. Since the brain cannot
multitask effectively, listening to a book while doing chores does not allow us
to absorb the essence of a book. In contrast, reading a book evokes undivided
attention and facilitates the development of focusing ability, thus also
leading to more absorption of the contents.
I consider custodians of a library to be the luckiest people on
earth, while the visitors to be next in the hierarchy to be lucky! However, as
we move up through the educational hierarchy, the tradition of visiting a
library slowly disappears from the curriculum. The students are embroiled with
the syllabus and supplied with readymade notes, thus diminishing the need to visit
a library. Therefore, visiting the library must be allocated a place in the
regular timetable.
Source: Herald, 11/11/21
“There has never been an age that did not applaud the past and lament the present.”
Lillian Eichler Watson
“ऐसा कोई युग कभी नहीं रहा जिसमें अतीत का गुणगान और वर्तमान पर विलाप न किया गया हो।”
लिलियन आइक्लर वॉटसन