Followers

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples Report

 The UN recently released the State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples Report. It reveals that Indigenous Peoples represent about six per cent of the global population. However, they protect approximately 80 per cent of the planet’s remaining biodiversity. Despite this, they receive less than 1% of international climate funding. This situation raises urgent questions about equity and inclusion in climate action.

Impact of Climate Change on Indigenous Economies

Indigenous economies primarily rely on agriculture, fishing, and forestry. Climate change introduces uncertainty into these livelihoods. Erratic weather patterns and environmental degradation diminish their economic self-sufficiency. As traditional practices become less viable, Indigenous communities face increased challenges in sustaining their way of life.

Disruption of Land and Natural Resources

Ancestral lands are under threat from climate change. This disruption affects traditional land-based practices. Indigenous Peoples’ environmental stewardship is undermined by external pressures. The loss of land not only threatens their sovereignty but also their cultural connection to the environment.

Health and Well-being Challenges

Indigenous Peoples experience heightened vulnerability to climate-related health issues. Limited access to healthcare exacerbates these challenges. Traditional food sources are also affected, leading to nutritional insecurity. The overall health and well-being of these communities are at risk due to climate impacts.

Threats to Linguistic and Cultural Heritage

Climate change poses threat to Indigenous languages and cultural identities. Many traditional practices and knowledge systems are intimately tied to the environment. As ecosystems change, the transmission of cultural heritage becomes endangered. This loss threatens the very identity of Indigenous communities.

Indigenous Peoples as Custodians of Biodiversity

Despite their small population size, Indigenous Peoples play important role in biodiversity conservation. They safeguard portion of the Earth’s remaining biodiversity. Their traditional knowledge offers valuable vital information about sustainable land management. Indigenous agricultural practices demonstrate how to care for the earth while preserving resources.

Traditional Knowledge

Indigenous knowledge systems offer innovative approaches to environmental management. For example, the Comcaac people of Mexico encode ecological knowledge in their language. This traditional wisdom can inform modern climate strategies. Cultural norms, such as prohibitions on cutting certain trees in Somalia, illustrate how Indigenous practices can contribute to sustainability.

Economic and Political Weekly: Table of Contents

 

Vol. 60, Issue No. 17, 26 Apr, 2025

Editorials

Comment

From 25 Years Ago

From 50 Years Ago

Strategic Affairs

Commentary

Review Article

Insight

Special Articles

Current Statistics

Postscript

Letters

Plug the gaps

 

It is high time to frame clear guidelines on how AI can be used in academic research. This responsibility falls on the Univeristy Grants Commission. The sooner it acts, the better




An incident has highlighted the necessity to decide how Artificial Intelligence should be used in academic research. This incident showed how a mistranslation by AI can do irreparable damage to academic research. It also revealed the risks of using unchecked automation in academia.

The controversy erupted when researchers began noticing a strange term — vegetative electron microscopy — appearing in multiple scientific papers. At first glance, the phrase seemed like a technical term. However, upon closer examination, experts realised that the term is nonsensical.

The anomaly was initially flagged on PubPeer, an online research forum, by a Russian chemist using a pseudonym. However, Alexander Magazinov, a software engineer, ultimately traced the origin of the error. His investigation led him back to a single mistranslation by AI from a 1959 scientific paper. The original phrase used in that paper, electron microscopy of vegetative structures, refers to a well-established method for studying plant tissues. Unfortunately, due to AI’s inaccurate interpretation, the text spread across multiple columns and the words got jumbled up inadvertently, creating an entirely new — and nonsensical —term.

Alarmingly, this error managed to slip through the peer review system. It went unnoticed by reviewers and was subsequently repeated in nearly two dozen published papers. This has raised serious concerns about the reliability of present-day academic review processes. Some critics blamed peer reviewers, arguing that their failure to detect such a glaring mistake points to the declining standards of scrutiny in academic publishing. Others defended the reviewers, pointing out that their expertise is often limited to specific aspects of a study and that such errors can be difficult to catch, especially when AI-generated text is involved.

While AI has undoubtedly transformed research — streamlining data analysis and accelerating new discoveries — this incident underscores a significant downside: the dangers of blind trust in AI-generated content. As academic institutions increasingly integrate AI into their research workflows, maintaining rigorous human surveillance on research has become an imperative. Without stringent quality control measures, such errors could proliferate, ultimately eroding the integrity of scientific literature and undermining public trust in academic research.

What about the uses of AI in research in the humanities and social sciences? Today, it is possible for a student to generate an entire term paper or research paper using AI. The problem is that there are no specific rules in our country to decide whether an AI-generated paper can be considered as legitimate work, or whether it should be treated as plagiarism. Some research journals are now mentioning in their calls for submissions that they will not accept AI-generated papers. However, as of now, the University Grants Commission has not issued any specific circular on the use of AI in research and PhD work.

Currently, the UGC regulations require plagiarism checks before submitting a PhD thesis. However, checking for AI-generated content is not yet mandatory. Some plagiarism-detection softwares can identify AI-generated content; some universities have already started implementing such checks. But until the UGC officially includes AI-generated content under the definition of plagiarism, can it truly be considered as such?

There is another question. If researchers correct grammatical and syntactical errors in their theses using AI, should the text be considered as AI-generated content or should it be treated as an act of plagiarism? Various software tools are available
for correcting grammar. Many researchers and educators use such tools. Is this a crime?

It is high time to frame clear guidelines on how AI can be used in academic research. This responsibility falls on the UGC. The sooner it acts, the better.

Angshuman Kar

Source:Telegraph India, 29/04/25

Technology is not enough

 

Technology can't redistribute household labour by itself. A societal shift is required, one that not only redistributes labour but also dismantles structures that confine women to domesticity



One woman makes a wrong turn and, suddenly, her accidental witness — the male driver — turns judge and jury, remarking that the entire female species should be exiled from the driver’s seat. Such is the attitude of men towards women using technology; or rather, women using technology in ‘masculine spaces’. But what happens when technology enters the household, a space that a man spends a lifetime avoiding? Does the allure of technology draw him into taking up — finally — domestic responsibilities? Or is it just false optimism being served through seemingly progressive marketing?

Automation promises to balance the scales at home. But the real question is, will it? In her book, TechnoFeminism, Judy Wajcman discusses the concept of “technological determinism” where technology is vi­ew­ed as a neutral force that shapes society. She critiq­ues this idea by arguing that technological development and its use are shaped by social, economic, and political factors, including gender, and that these factors influence how technologies are utilised in ways that maintain existing power structures. If the dominant culture continues to frame the household as a woman’s domain and percei­ves men’s participation in that space as emasculating, no amount of sleek branding or AI-powered efficiency can ‘defeminise’ household labour.

This framing of the household as a woman’s domain is not just rooted in the essentialist belief that women are inherently better at running a home but it is also a carefully maintained social construct. Historically, women’s movement beyond the home has long been perceived as a threat to male hegemony. So the very technology that promises to ‘liberate’ them, by making their household chores easier, thereby giving them time to ‘move out’, may, instead, be seen as an intrusion, one that destabilises the patriarchal order.

If automation is the way forward, to what extent does it actually transform the nature of the household is worth scrutinising. A machine only takes up fragments of a task. For example, a washing machine only executes the washing bit, that too after being operated manually. The drying and folding of the laundry remain out of its scope. Who, then, does the remaining task? Can the convenience introduced by technology encourage men to volunteer in household work? Possibly not; the reason being since the task is now deemed ‘easier’, women should have, the logic goes, even less reason to complain.

The monetary aspect of automating a household also calls for attention. A truly au­tomated home requires an entire fleet of machines where each task is performed by a specific machine. Unless automation is made accessible and affordable, such tech-based equality would remain illusionary. But even in households that can afford these high-tech advancements, convincing men to replace centuries of free female labour with pricey gadgets seems far-fetched, given that men serve as the fiscal autho­rities in most families. Moreover, in a society where woman’s labour is romanticised through notions such as ‘Maa ke haath ka khaana’ being an irreplaceable culinary standard, if the machine fails to produce the same taste, will the mother be summoned back to the kitchen?

There is also the question of agency. A woman’s ability to operate a device is not
solely determined by its design or her technological literacy but also by her autonomy to use it. Financial independence does not always grant women the freedom to make financial decisions due to deeply-ingrained societal norms; high-tech gadgets may encounter a similar fate. Women might feel hesitant to engage with these devices, fearing misuse or damage, ultimately reinforcing existing patterns of dependency.

Technology cannot redistribute household labour by itself. A broader societal shift is required, one that not only redistributes labour but also dismantles structures that confine women to domesticity.

Sanya Darapuri

Source: Telegraph India, 23/04/25

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Quote of the Day April 22, 2025

 

“By constant self-discipline and self-control you can develop greatness of character.”
Grenville Kleiser
“अात्मानुशासन और आत्मसंयम के माध्यम से आप चरित्र की महानता को हासिल कर सकते हैं।”
ग्रेनविल क्लाइज़र

Economic & Political Weekly: Table of Contents

 

Vol. 60, Issue No. 16, 19 Apr, 2025

Editorials

From 25 Years Ago

From 50 Years Ago

Law and Society

Budget 2025–26

Book Reviews

Insight

Special Articles

Current Statistics

Letters

Legend and legacy of the Mountain Man

 It was over four decades back that the news of Dashrath Manjhi, a villager from a remote part of Bihar, breaking a mountain to create a path had captured the imagination of the country.


It was over four decades back that the news of Dashrath Manjhi, a villager from a remote part of Bihar, breaking a mountain to create a path had captured the imagination of the country. The fact that he was poor and belonged to a landless family of ‘mahadalit’ category only added further to the inspirational legend of Manjhi who has been called The Mountain Man. From the Chief Minister to the Prime Minister, Manjhi received praise from many highly placed sources in the country.

What really proved inspirational for many people was the fact that at the age of 26 a poor youth took upon himself the impossible looking task of breaking a huge mountain to the extent of carving out a life-saving path that thousands of villagers needed urgently. He toiled tirelessly for 22 years (1960-82) and finally succeeded in his objective. Acclaim followed, but instead of just basking in glory he continued to work tirelessly for betterment of his village. This writer recently visited the village of Manjhi (Gehlour in Gaya district) to talk to villagers to better understand the legend and legacy of ‘the mountain man.’ He was a follower of Sant Kabir, the bhakti movement’s famous poet-saint of medieval times, who has remained one of the strongest and most revered voices of spirituality based on justice, truth and non-violence, and leading a simple and pious life free from all hypocrisy and falsehoods.

People from the Manjhi community to whom I spoke told me that whenever they went to mountains they found him at work just carrying some sattu in his bag, a legume-based powder which could give some energy and coolness when mixed with water. In 1960 Dashrath had gone to work on the mountain and his wife Phalguni Devi injured herself badly while carrying food and water for him. Looking at her injuries, he took a pledge to create a path in the mountain that may become a life-saver for people. This would give a safe path to everyone going to the other side, and in addition would bring closer the health, educational and other facilities of the nearest town to the people on this side of the mountain (the distance could come down from about 55 km to about 15 km).

Contrary to some published accounts, several villagers told me that Phalguni Devi did not die from these injuries but instead continued to be helpful to her husband and the pledge he had taken. She died some years later. Using the simplest tools like a hammer and a chisel, Manjhi embarked on his great journey that was to be completed in 22 years. Initially people ridiculed him and some even called him ‘mad’ for taking up such a huge task. Undaunted, he continued this work on a regular, daily basis. We must not forget that he came from the poorest community and had to also earn his livelihood to support his four-member family (which included a son and a daughter).

Initially most villagers had ridiculed or neglected Manjhi, but once his work of a few years started showing signs of leading to success, some villagers also started lending a helping hand now and then. Finally, in 1982, Manjhi succeeded in creating a path which was wide enough for a bullock-cart to pass. Later the government helped to widen this and build a proper road. Manjhi now decided to go and meet senior government officials in Delhi to take up several development works much needed by his village and neighboring communities. Education and health were emphasized by him. However as he could not buy a rail ticket he was asked to get down from the train after covering a short distance.

He now decided to walk to Delhi along the railway track, hoping that this would perhaps draw even more attention to his objective of promoting development work in his village and neighboring villages. An elderly farmer of a neighboring village told me that Manjhi had managed to meet the then Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi and had shared with him a press clipping of this. Later Manjhi also went to meet the Chief Minister of Bihar Nitish Kumar who gave him a lot of respect. However despite his increasing fame, Manjhi retained his simplicity. A local teacher, Virendra Paswan, told me that when he was on a train word spread of his presence and there was a rush of people just to catch a glimpse of him. However, Paswan said, even at that time Manjhi was wearing a dress made from a jute sack, as he often did earlier too. In 2007, Manjhi was admitted to AIIMS hospital in Delhi where he breathed his last on August 17.

A memorial and gates were constructed in his village in his honour. However, the people of the Manjhi community and other landless and poor Dalit community members continue to live in this village in great poverty and several of them told me that even their housing situation is precarious. The government needs to do much more to help them with a sense of urgency. Meanwhile the SBI Foundation has taken up an admirable initiative called SAMMAAN with implementation assistance of Sahbhagi Shikshan Kendra to honour the memory of Dashrath Manjhi in the form of many-sided efforts in his village to improve education, health, infrastructure and livelihoods that have been widely appreciated. I visited three settlements of the Manjhi community here and villagers expressed their appreciation of the good work done by the SBI Foundation.

At the same time they repeatedly drew attention to their continuing poverty and their dependence on migrant labour. They have to regularly go to brick kilns to toil in exploitative conditions in distant parts. Their housing situation has become precarious as they face eviction threats. There is an extreme shortage of water for almost six months in a year, if not more. The condition of other Dalit and poor communities like Ravidasis is also dismal. The government and society need to do much more to help the community of Dashrath Manjhi as well as all other Dalit and weaker sections in this village and neighboring areas to honour the legacy of the Mountain Man.

BHARAT DOGRA 

Source: The Statesman, 16/04/25D