Followers

Monday, September 18, 2023

Unified Portal for Agricultural Statistics (UPAg)

 The Indian government has introduced the Unified Portal for Agricultural Statistics (UPAg), an online platform developed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. It is hailed as a significant leap forward in managing agricultural data. The UPAg Portal is intended to serve as a public resource, streamlining access to credible, granular, and objective data while reducing search costs and inefficiencies for users.

The UPAg Portal’s core function is to generate crop estimates and integrate with other agriculture-related statistical systems. It aims to combat challenges like non-standardized and unverified data, ultimately supporting data-driven decision-making in India’s agriculture sector.


What benefits does the UPAg Portal offer to users?

Users will experience reduced search costs, easier access to credible data, and the opportunity to make data-driven decisions in agriculture.

How does the UPAg Portal aim to address challenges in the agriculture sector?

It intends to provide real-time, standardized, and verified data on agricultural commodities, combating issues like non-standardized and unverified data.

What role does the UPAg Portal play in generating agricultural statistics?

The platform is designed to generate crop estimates and integrate with other systems generating agriculture statistics such as price, trade, procurement, and stock.

How does the UPAg Portal align with the principles of e-governance?

The initiative aligns with e-governance principles by bringing smartness, transparency, and agility to India’s agriculture sector.

What are some of the other initiatives mentioned in the article that the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare is working on?

The ministry is concurrently working on initiatives like the Krishi Decision Support System, farmer registry, and crop survey to enhance data accuracy and digital data governance in agriculture.

Limits of identity: On facilitating peace in Manipur

 

Civil society should strive to be non-partisan to aid peace in Manipur



One of the most disconcerting features of the ongoing ethnic strife in Manipur remains the inability of civil society representatives to rise above their “ethnic” affiliations and work towards peace. This is exemplified by the acts of the Meira Paibi, an amorphous organisation of Meitei women, who have in the past mobilised against armed forces and police excesses, alcoholism, drug addiction and sexual violence in the State. During the conflict that has raged on since early May, however, the Meira Paibi has been working towards disrupting the operations of the Assam Rifles in their attempt to maintain peace, especially in the foothills. These areas, called “buffer zones”, were created to ensure that there is no further escalation of violence between arms-wielding people of the two ethnic communities, but there have been violent attacks with the armed forces unable to act on time because of disruptions, allegedly, by the Meira Paibi among others. Clearly, the situation has been brought to a boil by the looting of weapons by both Kuki-Zo and Meitei groups and their use in the strife. But the inability of the State government and its police and the Union government-deployed armed forces in maintaining peace has also been due to civil society groups supporting those engaging in violence.

Some Meira Paibi representatives had, in a press conference in New Delhi on Wednesday, claimed that they do not recognise the buffer zones, calling them “unconstitutional”. The presence of armed forces in peacekeeping is not an ideal solution in most circumstances. But with the ethnicisation of law enforcement, aided by a State government that seems to have lost its legitimacy of power across ethnic divides, leading to demands for a separate administration by Kuki-Zo representatives, the armed forces’ presence and the need for buffer zones to maintain a semblance of peace have become essential in Manipur. Civil society groups such as the Meira Paibi can rise above their narrow ethnic identities to press for justice for women affected in the conflict and thus build solidarity networks that will aid the process of reconciliation and peace-building. Sadly, that does not seem to be the case today. Civil society organisations have whipped up the frenzy of ethnic hatred, partially due to the recurring trauma from the violence, as much as cynical political representatives have. And this has meant that the cycle of violence has endured. History suggests that a breakthrough can only be achieved through non-partisan leadership and civic dialogue among civil society and political representatives. As things stand, for that to happen there needs to be a credible alternative to the current leadership in the State.

Source: The Hindu, 15/09/23

Cold War 2.0

 hat the United States of America is entering a consequential period in its relations with China is beyond doubt. The trajectory of this bilateral relationship will shape both countries’ foreign policy agendas for decades to come. At a time when the characterisation of the intensifying competition between the USA and China as “a new Cold War” has gained global currency, what aspects of the US-Soviet or original Cold War are applicable even today? Matthew Turpin of the Hoover Institution nails it in a recent research article when he writes that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) views the USA as an existential threat. That is the starting point of this debate. Over the past few years, a new geopolitical condition has emerged.

The USA and China coexist, if somewhat uneasily, in a multipolar world in which each side is deeply suspicious of and hostile to the worldview of the other. Simultaneously, adds Turpin, both Washington and Beijing recognise that they cannot overpower their rival, which compels them to avoid direct military conflict while pushing their rivalry into other domains. Pithily put, this geopolitical condition is called a cold war. Thus, it is important to differentiate between the term “cold war”, and the proper noun “Cold War,” an event that took place between the USA and the USSR from 1947 to 1991. The historical event involved specific circumstances and actors, but the condition defined by the term (a state of political hostility between countries that unfolds across all domains short of open, direct warfare) aptly applies to today’s Sino-American situation, just as it did a generation ago to the US-Soviet rivalry. Therefore, goes the argument, the question that some scholars and commentators still ask ~ are the USA and China ‘destined’ for a new cold war ~ is a category error, iterates Turpin. The cold war already exists.

A unique attribute of cold wars, however, is that their beginning can only be perceived in retrospect; belligerents don’t issue formal declarations of hostility. A cold war starts incrementally as the weight of actions by both sides builds “until we reach what George Orwell called a peace that is no peace”. Beijing seems to have learnt lessons from the Cold War better than that confrontation’s victor, at least in one respect. If your rival is reluctant to acknowledge a cold war exists, it can be advantageous to paint them as harbouring a “Cold War mentality” as the CCP and the top echelons of the People’s Republic of China routinely does. It helps complicate the adversary’s political decision-making, especially if it is a democracy which for all its flaws America is, even as one wages a cold war against it as China is certainly doing. That is the grim reality. Costly and dangerous as it is, the American establishment, especially of the left-liberal variety, needs to internalise it if it is to design an effective foreign policy vis-à-vis Beijing.

Source: The Statesman, 14/09/23

Unveiling the 5 Challenges of Researching in India

 The advancement of both a student’s abilities as well as the cause of education relies on scholarly research. At various levels of education, students involved in research are constantly honing a variety of future ready skills, while also achieving significant breakthroughs. Research thrives when scientists can devote their time and energy to solving problems. India presents a promising landscape of research and when Indian researchers can strike the delicate balance between teaching, administrative tasks, and their core research, they are able to achieve outstanding scientific outcomes. Like any other genre of work, research in India also presents labyrinthine challenges waiting to be conquered. In this article, we explore the multifaceted complexities that researchers encounter in their pursuit of scientific excellence and examine the steps needed to elevate the research ecosystem in India.

  • Cultivating a supportive ecosystem

A flourishing research ecosystem thrives on funding opportunities, infrastructure, and a critical mass of expertise. Enhancing the quantum of allocation of research funds through government grants, which is the primary support for Indian researchers albeit competitive to secure, can result in proliferation of more ideas coming to life. To avoid delays in research, an early start is recommended, especially when reaching out to foreign companies for equipment, software, and technical services. Since technical support and repair services for imported equipment are time-consuming, once these stumbling blocks are overcome by building domestic supply chain and local manufacturing, research can be pursued smoothly. Enabling research exposure at undergraduate level can motivate more youngsters to pursue research as a career.

  • Focusing on Positive Funding Balance

The essence of research lies in its contribution to society's betterment. Practical solutions derived from research endeavors typically emerge as the culmination of efforts spanning fundamental and applied stages, alongside engineering development across various Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Striking the right equilibrium among these facets - fundamental exploration, application-driven research, and technological advancement - is pivotal in nurturing a sustainable innovation pipeline. This holistic approach ensures the creation of impactful solutions to address grand challenges.

Notably, contemporary trends in funded projects exhibit a significant drive toward supporting initiatives with the potential for commercial translation into products or services. While this direction fosters practicality, it's essential to remember that preserving space for fundamental research is equally vital. This positive synergy among various research dimensions fosters a vibrant and holistic research ecosystem.

  • Enhancing the Evaluation System

Researchers are driven by their desire to translate their discoveries into meaningful social contributions. However, a hurdle arises when the researcher’s credibility is assessed primarily through metrics tied to publications rather than real-world impact generated. To better align with the broader goal of social impact, there’s a growing need for a refined metric that accurately gauges the extent of positive change. Shifting the balance to assign greater importance to impact will catalyze research endeavors that drive meaningful transformations in society.

  • Building Trust

Scientists often prioritize delving into the fundamental aspects of a problem, and publishing their observations, sometimes sidelining the application of their findings. However, recognizing the value of impactful outcomes, researchers can make significant contributions by formulating research proposals that address pressing societal needs. By bridging this gap between fundamental exploration and real-world innovation, the innovation pipeline gains momentum, revitalizing the confidence of grant agencies in research proposals with a focus on fundamental aspects. Subsequently, funding agencies will show greater appetite for risk and support novel, ‘high-risk-high-reward’ ideas that pave the way for groundbreaking discoveries.

  • Nurturing Collaboration and Entrepreneurship

To ensure the sustainable growth of research laboratories, scientists often dedicate their energies to securing grants, sometimes overshadowing the potential of commercializing outcomes through patents and technology transfers to industry. However, a more sustainable approach emerges through embracing entrepreneurship and collaborative innovation. In the modern research landscape, interdisciplinary efforts have become paramount, with collaboration of engineers with physicists, chemists, biologists, and material scientists propelling progress. A shift from solely competitive mindset to a cooperative one, will fuel sustained advancement and nurture an environment where researchers can achieve greater breakthroughs together.


Dr. Amruta R Behera

Source: The Telegraph, 9/09/23


Tuesday, September 12, 2023

Quote of the Day September 12, 2023

 

“The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will.”
Vince Lombardi
“किसी सफल व्यक्ति तथा दूसरों के बीच में अंतर ताकत का नहीं, ज्ञान का नहीं, बल्कि इच्छाशक्ति का होता है।”
विंस लोमबार्डी

Economic & Political Weekly: Table of Contents

 

Vol. 58, Issue No. 36, 09 Sep, 2023

Editorials

Comment

From 25 Years Ago

From 50 Years Ago

Commentary

Book Reviews

Special Articles

Discussion

Current Statistics

Postscript

Letters

The Gender Snapshot 2023 Report

 he United Nations has released a report stating that the goal of achieving gender equality by 2030, as set by the U.N., is unlikely to be realized due to deeply ingrained biases against women in various sectors such as health, education, employment, and politics. The report, titled “The Gender Snapshot 2023,” highlights that active resistance to gender equality and chronic underinvestment are key factors slowing progress and even leading to reversals in some cases.

Issues like unequal access to sexual and reproductive health, political underrepresentation, economic disparities, and a lack of legal protection contribute to this challenge. The report also calls attention to setbacks for women and girls in conflict-affected regions and the adverse impact of climate change.


What is the status of poverty among women according to the report?

The report notes that one in every ten women today, or 10.3%, lives in extreme poverty, defined as having less than $2.15 a day. If current trends continue, it predicts that 8% of the world’s female population will still be living in extreme poverty in 2030, with a significant proportion in Sub-Saharan Africa.

How does the report assess the status of education for girls and young women globally?

While access to education is increasing for both boys and girls, the report reveals that millions of girls never enter a classroom or complete their education, especially in conflict-affected areas. It estimates that up to 129 million girls and young women may be out of school globally in 2023, with an estimated 110 million still out of school in 2030 if current trends persist.

What financial measures does the report suggest are needed to achieve gender equality by 2030?

The report estimates that $6.4 trillion per year is required across 48 developing countries to achieve gender equality in various key areas by 2030. It calls for increased funding for programs promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment. The report warns of an annual shortfall of $360 billion if current government expenditures continue on their current trajectory, and it appeals for additional funding to bridge this gap.