The District Good Governance Index (DGGI) has emerged as a significant tool in assessing and benchmarking governance at the district level in India. Arunachal Pradesh, a state in the northeast region, has implemented this innovative approach to evaluate the effectiveness of governance in its 25 districts
DGGI: A Path to Next-Generation Administrative Reforms
The District Good Governance Index, is a comprehensive assessment developed jointly by the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances (DARPG) and the Government of Arunachal Pradesh. This index signifies a leap towards next-generation administrative reforms by providing a standardized framework for evaluating governance practices.
Arunachal Pradesh’s Leading Role
Arunachal Pradesh has taken the lead in embracing the DGGI as the first state in the northeast region to implement this initiative. The index benchmarks governance across the state’s 25 districts, covering various sectors and indicators, with a total of 65 indicators used to assess the districts’ performance.
Ranking and Divisions
The districts of Arunachal Pradesh have been categorized into three divisions: East, West, and Central. This division-wise ranking enables a better understanding of the governance landscape within the state and facilitates targeted interventions to address specific challenges and gaps.
Promoting Effective Governance
The District Good Governance Index serves as a valuable tool for providing guidance to the state government and district administration in addressing existing gaps and formulating strategies for improvement. By promoting healthy competition among districts, the index fosters a citizen-centric approach to administration and encourages good governance practices.
Enhancing Decision-Making
The DGGI’s comprehensive assessment enables decision-makers to make informed choices by analyzing the performance of districts across multiple sectors. It facilitates evidence-based decision-making, aiding policymakers in developing effective strategies and interventions to bridge gaps and improve governance outcomes.
