Followers

Tuesday, October 09, 2018

UN report on climate change sets off alarm bells

Investing in climate change makes ecological and economic sense. Keeping emissions down will boost economic growth and save the expenditure on its catastrophic fallouts

Climate change is a ticking bomb counting down to 2052, the zero year after which even a half degree increase in global temperature will lead to searing heat waves, heavy rainfall, droughts, floods and other extreme weather conditions that will lower agricultural yield, cause food and water scarcities and push millions into poverty, the world’s leading climate scientists have warned. The world is already 1°Celsius warmer than the pre-industrial levels and, if present trends continue, the rise in average temperatures will breach the critical barrier of 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052. All countries must make rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes across sectors to keep the increase to within 1.5°C over pre-industrial levels (1850-1900) to stop the devastating consequences of climate change, said the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report in its most dire risk assessment ever. Even a fraction of additional warming would worsen the impact, said the report, warning that he world is off track to meet its 2015 Paris Agreement commitment to keep the average global temperatures “well below” 2°C.
The unprecedented flooding in Kerala, drought in Cape Town and searing heat waves in Europe are signs that climate change is already happening. Limiting warming to 1.5°C by making green changes in energy consumption, land and water use and transportation can help mitigate the potential damage to an extent.
To ensure the planet is liveable, global CO2 emissions have to be reduced by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030 and renewables must provide up to 85% of global electricity by 2050 to meet targets. All this would need an annual average investment of around $2.4 trillion in energy systems to move from coal to renewables between 2016 and 2035. Keeping emissions down, however, will boost economic growth and save the expenditure on catastrophic fallouts of climate change. That means putting money into saving the planet before it reaches tipping point. That makes ecological and economic sense.
Source: Hindustan Times, 8/10/2018
Overcome Evil With Her

The autumn festival of Durga Puja commemorates the victory of Goddess Durga over the buffalodemon Mahishasura and celebrates her annual visit to the terrestrial home of her parents. The central image of the mother goddess is in iconographic conformity to her description in Devi Mahatmyam, popularly known as Chandipath, which is recited during the puja. Flanked by Lakshmi, Saraswati, Kartikeya and Ganesha, the 10-armed embodiment of Shakti has a weapon in each hand, with lion as her mount, and the spear thrust into the chest of the demon in human form, halfemerged from the carcass of a slain buffalo. Durga is the militant manifestation of Parvati, Shiva’s consort. The Devi Mahatmyam refers to her identification with Shakti, power, Maya, illusion, and Prakriti, nature. As Shakti, she epitomises divine power and surpasses the gods in what is considered to be a male preserve. As the personification of Maya, in the Madhu-Kaitabha legend, she deludes the demons so that Vishnu can overpower them. The armour given to her by Vishnu is the elusive Maya that makes her invisible. Maya as a complex concept can be a positive force when resorted to by the deity as a necessary aid to subdue the evil elements. The destruction of evil forces seems to be a kind of lila, a game for her. As Prakriti, she is inseparably connected with the physical world. According to the scriptures, she personifies earth itself and stands for cosmic stability, sustains all beings of this earth and provides food

Source: Economic Times, 9/10/2018

Monday, October 08, 2018

Economic and Political Weekly: Table of Contents


Vol. 53, Issue No. 40, 06 Oct, 2018

At the ‘university of green forests’


How Xi Jinping’s rural stint when he was a teenager shaped his political life

Chinese President Xi Jinping is arguably the most powerful leader of his country since Mao Zedong. During the 19th Party Congress last October, the ‘Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era’ was inscribed into the party charter. Earlier, in 2016, the party accorded him special stature by making him the ‘Core Leader’. Inside the Mind of Xi Jinping by François Bougon, an Asia specialist and economics correspondent at Le Monde , traces the rise of Mr. Xi, arguing that in his quest to become the world’s most powerful leader, he must balance Mao’s Little Red Book with The Analects of Confucius . An excerpt:
The idea of progressive and rational ascent towards the highest functions of power is not just marketing spin. It is both the cornerstone of the Chinese model and its justification. But is Xi Jinping truly the perfect illustration of this ‘meritocracy’?
That Xi did indeed start off quite low down the hierarchy is undeniable, even if in truth he was put there by the regime. What the propaganda machine has turned into a significant feat — reaching the top of the hierarchy starting from nothing — glosses over the trials and tribulations involved. Xi was sent to the countryside during the Cultural Revolution, where he endured difficult conditions. Before that he was a well-off Beijing schoolboy. In 1968, to put an end to the chaos he had himself brought about, Mao had decided to empty the cities of their youth and send them out amongst the peasants to be re-educated. ‘I studied at the university of green forests, that is where I learned something,’ he said in 1964, relaunching a 1950s movement known as shangshan xiaxiang(‘go up the mountains, go down to the countryside’).
The directive that would affect Xi and millions of other students was read out on the radio on a winter evening in 1968, 21 December, and published the next day in the People’s Daily ( Renmin Ribao ): It is absolutely necessary for educated youth to go to the countryside to get re-educated by the poor and lower-middle peasants. We must persuade the officials and other inhabitants of the cities to send their children who are graduates of secondary schools and universities to the countryside. There should be an effort to mobilise. The comrades from all the rural areas should welcome these youths.
Xi Jinping was fifteen at the time and got caught up in the movement. It was an exodus on an unprecedented scale in the country’s history, affecting about 17 million people in total. The same scenes were witnessed throughout the country: columns of young people heading towards the stations, to the rhythm of revolutionary chants and songs; the outpourings of enthusiasm; the farewells; the welcoming committees on their arrival in the country; and then the billeting. Those who left in 1968 or 1969 were keen to go. Many, like Xi, volunteered. And this decision was to prove fundamental to his intellectual development.
The pull of ‘Yellow Earth’
The young Xi was happy to escape the stifling political atmosphere of the city. In those troubled times, when one had always to demonstrate ever purer revolutionary zeal, his ‘family history’ worked against him. His father had been the victim of a political purge and ousted in 1962.
When a father is chastised, there are two types of sons: those who avenge them, and those who atone for them. Xi belongs to the second category. He has always sought to erase the mark left on him by his father’s faults. And so, the teenage Xi left Beijing. He requested to go to northern China, to a village near Yan’an. He had heard his family mention the place: it was there that his father had headed a combat base at the beginning of the Revolution, in the 1930s. The region, now called ‘Yellow Earth’ after the colour of its loess soil, is considered the cradle of Chinese civilisation. With its cave-houses ( yaodong ), it is redolent of the ancestral era of the Yellow Emperor, the mythical founder of Chinese civilisation 5,000 years ago.
The loess plateaux are also legendary in Revolutionary folklore for having been Mao’s stronghold before his 1949 victory; the communist leader and his comrades had sought refuge in this bare land from the pursuing Nationalist troops. There are many famous photographs of Mao in his padded jacket, standing before a cave or writing inside his refuge. In other words, for the Chinese people, this yellow earth is a site of collective memory, and Xi Jinping would use that to his advantage. Put simply, his sojourn in the region allowed him to link big — imperial — history to both Revolutionary history and his own family history.
The first months were difficult. Three months after his arrival, he returned to Beijing. But he was arrested and sentenced to a spell of re-education through labour. He dug trenches for water pipes in a Beijing neighbourhood. He eventually returned to the village of Liangjiahe on his family’s advice. Did he want to end up a delinquent on the run?
This time around, the young Xi adjusted to country life and settled in. This transformation is key to understanding Xi Jinping’s career. He still refers to it today as the founding event of his political life.
Source: The Hindu, 8/10/18

Real, sustainable peace does not come about by chance

The UN Security Council has dispatched more than 70 operations to help maintain cease-fires between countries, end protracted civil wars, protect the vulnerable and save lives, strengthen the rule of law, establish new security institutions, and help new countries, such as Timor Leste, come into being.

United Nations peacekeeping is a concrete example of multilateralism at work. It demonstrates how the global community can address some of today’s most complex and dangerous issues with a mixture of creativity and pragmatism.
Since the first blue helmets were deployed in 1948, peacekeeping has enabled the countries of the world to meet common threats to peace and security and share the burden under the UN flag. Over the past 70 years, more than one million peacekeepers — women and men, soldiers, police, and civilians from countries across the world — have responded to a vast range of conflicts, and peacekeeping has adapted constantly to meet these demands.
The UN Security Council has dispatched more than 70 operations to help maintain ceasefires between countries, end protracted civil wars, protect the vulnerable and save lives, strengthen the rule of law, establish new security institutions, and help new countries, such as Timor Leste, come into being.
But peacekeeping is a dangerous business. Tens of thousands of peacekeepers today are deployed where there is little peace to keep. Last year, 61 peacekeepers were killed in hostile acts, and our peacekeepers were attacked more than 300 times — almost once a day. In Mali and in the Central African Republic, I saw for myself the important work the blue helmets do every day — not only keeping the peace but supporting the delivery of humanitarian aid and protecting civilians. I’ve also laid too many wreaths for fallen peacekeepers.
We have enacted new measures to address the rise in fatalities, and I have commissioned independent strategic reviews of each peacekeeping operation. But it’s clear to me that we don’t have any chance of succeeding without the world’s clear and unambiguous support.
Expectations of peacekeeping vastly outstrip both support and resources. Yes, we need more helicopters, we need mine-proof vehicles and night vision, and we need police and civilians with specialised skills to help us build sustainable peace. But we also need UN Member States to send us personnel equipped and trained properly and with the mindset to use these capabilities effectively. And, above all, we need their sustained political commitment, a critical factor in the long-term success of our peacekeeping operations.
That is the background to the Action for Peacekeeping initiative, launched in March. It aims to ask all UN Member States and other partners to revitalise their commitment to UN peacekeeping so that we can continue to improve it together. We’ve had in-depth and candid discussions to identify the areas where more effort is required and created a Declaration of Shared Commitments on UN Peacekeeping Operations.
The declaration represents a clear and urgent agenda for peacekeeping. By endorsing the declaration, governments show their commitment to advancing political solutions to conflicts, to strengthening protection for the vulnerable people under our charge, and to improving the safety and security of our peacekeepers. Now we need to translate these commitments into practical support in the field.
The declaration calls for all of us to improve our operations, to increase the participation of women in all areas of peacekeeping, to strengthen partnerships with governments, and to take measures to ensure our personnel live up to the highest standards of conduct and discipline.
Unacceptable cases of sexual exploitation and abuse have tarnished the reputation of UN peacekeeping, and I am determined to do everything in my power to prevent and end this scourge. We must hold ourselves accountable to the highest standards of performance and conduct. As of today, 141 countries [including India] and three international and regional organisations have made these commitments, signalling a consensus around renewed support for UN peacekeeping.
These countries include those that decide on peacekeeping mandates in the Security Council and those that contribute the women and men who serve as peacekeepers; those that pay for peacekeeping missions; and the governments of countries where peacekeeping missions are deployed.
Representatives from these countries and organisations met on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly last week to express their commitment to peacekeeping, celebrate its many achievements, discuss the challenges we face, and renew their support.
But the real test will come on the ground in our missions around the world. Real, sustainable peace does not come about by chance. It is hard and sometimes expensive work to support countries on their path from conflict to stability
It is hard and sometimes expensive work to support countries on their path from conflict to stability, but it is a lot cheaper than war in every sense.
For our part, we are determined that UN peacekeeping will live up to the expectations of the millions of people we serve and who depend on us.
The cost of failure is unacceptable. We cannot let them down.
Antonio Guterres is UN Secretary-General
Source: Hindustan Times, 6/10/18

No One To Awaken


Consciousness is all there is. This means that there is really neither creation nor dissolution. The individual as an independent autonomous entity being in charge of his life is the primary illusion in the illusion that life and living is. If you are prepared to accept this primary truth, there can be no more questions left to answer. Whatever questions remain must necessarily remain in the illusory dream world. And it is in this context of the dream character in the dream world that the illusory individual seeker, suffering illusory bondage, seeks illusory individual realisation. Telling him that he simply does not exist only adds insult to the injury of his suffering. The illusory individual entity believes that Selfrealisation means freedom from bondage. A true jnani, out of compassion, finds it necessary to admit that in his case total understanding has indeed happened, and that he would discuss the matter with the illusory. All this while the true jnani is fully aware that the very essence of Selfrealisation is the realisation that there is no one to awaken, that there is in fact no separate individual. The final pronouncement “there is nobody home”, is suffused with meaning. The fact is not that there is no one to awaken, but that there really is no separate individual. The state of Self-realisation begins, perhaps, with the state of the Stitha-pragnya in the Bhagwad Gita: The state in which the true jnani lives the rest of his life in the world.

Source: Economic Times, 8/10/18
Deadly heatwaves could hit India: Climate change report

‘1.5°C Temp Rise May Happen As Early As 2030’

 India could face an annual threat of deadly heatwaves, like the one in 2015 that killed at least 2,500 people, if the world gets warmer by 2 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial levels, says the muchanticipated world’s biggest review report on climate change. The report is to be released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on Monday. TOI had a sneak preview of the report to be released internationally on Monday morning. The implications of the report will be discussed at the Katowice climate change conference in Poland this December, where governments will review the Paris Agreement to tackle climate change. Being one of the largest carbon-emitting nations, India is expected to be a key player in the global event. Ringing the alarm bells on runaway rise in temperatures, the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 degrees C warns that average global temperatures could breach the 1.5 degree level as early as 2030. “Global warming is likely to reach 1.5 degree Celsius (above pre-industrial levels) between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the same rate,” the report said.

Kolkata could face higher threat of heat waves: IPCC

In the Indian subcontinent, the IPCC report specifically mentions Kolkata and Karachi among cities that could face an increased threat of heat waves. “Karachi and Kolkata can expect annual conditions equivalent to their deadly 2015 heat waves. Climate change is significantly contributing to increased heat-related mortality,” it stated. “It is now the scientific consensus that global warming affects human health, causing loss of millions of lives,” co-author of the report Arthur Wyns from Climate Tracker told TOI. The report states that forglobal warming to be contained at 1.5 degrees C, the net human-caused CO2 emissions would need to fall by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching net zero by around 2050. The ‘1.5 Health Report’, which is a synthesis of the health content of IPCC report compiled by experts from University of Washington, World Health Organisation and Climate tracker, highlighted that India and Pakistan could be worst affected in the event of a 2 degree Celsius increase. Climate change is also projected to be a “poverty multiplier” through food insecurity, higher food prices, income losses, lost livelihood opportunities, adverse health impacts and population displacements. According to the IPCC report, poverty is expected to increase with rise in global warming. “Limiting global warming to 1.5 degree Celsius as against 2 degree Celsius can reduce the number of people exposed to climate-related risks and poverty by up to several hundred million by 2050,” the report said. The same limit can result in reduced losses in yields of maize, rice, wheat and other cereal crops, particularly in Asia. The report also suggests mitigation measures to reduce anthropogenic net emissions of carbon dioxide. As reported by TOI earlier, India emitted nearly 929 million tonnes of CO2 in last fiscal from the thermal power sector alone, which accounts for 79% of the country’s power generation.

Source: Times of India, 8/10/2018